A game of tariffs: is there demand for tariffs in Europe?

In April 2025, the United States introduced sweeping tariffs on imports from the European Union and the United Kingdom, raising transatlantic tensions and prompting debate over Europe’s response. This study examines whether Europeans support domestic tariffs, either as protectionist or retaliatory measures. While polls suggest strong backing for retaliatory tariffs against the US, such attitudes may reflect patriotic or emotional reactions. To test preferences for tariff policies in a more realistic setting, we conducted two pre-registered conjoint experiments: a government-preference experiment in Germany and a candidate-choice experiment in the United Kingdom. In these experiments, tariff proposals appeared alongside other policies, mirroring multidimensional political landscapes. Contrary to expectations, Europeans consistently rejected tariffs in favor of alternative economic policies regardless of whether framed as protectionist, funding green initiatives, or responding to US actions. This absence of support is observed across social groups and cannot be explained by pre-existing attitudes toward the United States or President Trump. Our findings suggest that demand for protectionism is weaker than direct polling implies, and that public appetite for tariff measures is lower than early surveys suggested. As global trade tensions escalate, understanding public demand is essential for designing trade policies that are both effective and democratically grounded.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Public Policy
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2571062
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A game of tariffs: is there demand for tariffs in Europe?

Michal Grahn, Maria Nordbrandt, Stuart J. Turnbull‐Dugarte, Katharina Lawall et al.
Journal of European Public Policy
European Union Policy and Governance
article

A game of tariffs: is there demand for tariffs in Europe?

Michal Grahn, Maria Nordbrandt, Stuart J. Turnbull‐Dugarte, Katharina Lawall, Sophie Mainz
article en

Abstract

In April 2025, the United States introduced sweeping tariffs on imports from the European Union and the United Kingdom, raising transatlantic tensions and prompting debate over Europe’s response. This study examines whether Europeans support domestic tariffs, either as protectionist or retaliatory measures. While polls suggest strong backing for retaliatory tariffs against the US, such attitudes may reflect patriotic or emotional reactions. To test preferences for tariff policies in a more realistic setting, we conducted two pre-registered conjoint experiments: a government-preference experiment in Germany and a candidate-choice experiment in the United Kingdom. In these experiments, tariff proposals appeared alongside other policies, mirroring multidimensional political landscapes. Contrary to expectations, Europeans consistently rejected tariffs in favor of alternative economic policies regardless of whether framed as protectionist, funding green initiatives, or responding to US actions. This absence of support is observed across social groups and cannot be explained by pre-existing attitudes toward the United States or President Trump. Our findings suggest that demand for protectionism is weaker than direct polling implies, and that public appetite for tariff measures is lower than early surveys suggested. As global trade tensions escalate, understanding public demand is essential for designing trade policies that are both effective and democratically grounded.

Journal of European Public Policy
Uppsala University (SE), University of Southampton (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.