NON-MACROECONOMIC RISK AND RETURN ANALYSIS OF STOCK MARKET VS. REAL ESTATE IN MUMBAI

This study examines risk and return in Mumbai's Indian stock market and the city's real estate sector using non-macroeconomic factors. It uses a mixed-methods approach, analysing historical performance data and surveying 152 investors and professionals. Risk-adjusted returns are measured using metrics like Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), volatility, Sharpe ratio, rental yield, and Maximum Drawdown (MDD). The study excludes macroeconomic variables like inflation and interest rates, focusing on micro-level determinants of investment performance. The stock market showed superior capital appreciation, but with higher volatility and liquidity risks. Mumbai's real estate, particularly in prime commercial zones, provided more stable income through rental yields and lower volatility but suffered from low liquidity, high entry/exit costs, and regulatory risk. The study found that 62% preferred stocks for higher risk-adjusted returns, while 70% saw real estate as more stable but illiquid. The findings help investors identify optimal asset allocation strategies, with a 60-40 portfolio split favouring equities as an ideal balance between growth and income. Policymakers and regulators are urged to focus on strengthening RERA compliance, improving transparency in real estate, and fostering REITs and systematic investment plans to make both asset classes more accessible and efficient.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52152/801933
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NON-MACROECONOMIC RISK AND RETURN ANALYSIS OF STOCK MARKET VS. REAL ESTATE IN MUMBAI

Srushti Gore, Deepika Chaplot, Sameer Nanivadekar
Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
Housing Market and Economics
article

NON-MACROECONOMIC RISK AND RETURN ANALYSIS OF STOCK MARKET VS. REAL ESTATE IN MUMBAI

Srushti Gore, Deepika Chaplot, Sameer Nanivadekar
article en

Abstract

This study examines risk and return in Mumbai's Indian stock market and the city's real estate sector using non-macroeconomic factors. It uses a mixed-methods approach, analysing historical performance data and surveying 152 investors and professionals. Risk-adjusted returns are measured using metrics like Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), volatility, Sharpe ratio, rental yield, and Maximum Drawdown (MDD). The study excludes macroeconomic variables like inflation and interest rates, focusing on micro-level determinants of investment performance. The stock market showed superior capital appreciation, but with higher volatility and liquidity risks. Mumbai's real estate, particularly in prime commercial zones, provided more stable income through rental yields and lower volatility but suffered from low liquidity, high entry/exit costs, and regulatory risk. The study found that 62% preferred stocks for higher risk-adjusted returns, while 70% saw real estate as more stable but illiquid. The findings help investors identify optimal asset allocation strategies, with a 60-40 portfolio split favouring equities as an ideal balance between growth and income. Policymakers and regulators are urged to focus on strengthening RERA compliance, improving transparency in real estate, and fostering REITs and systematic investment plans to make both asset classes more accessible and efficient.

Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-GovernmentVol. 23(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.