Elevating Satisfaction: Library System Impact on User Material Access and Satisfaction

This study assessed the level of student satisfaction with the current manual borrowing system of the library in contrast to automation. It employed the quantitative type of research with a descriptive-comparative design. The study aimed to describe the respondents using frequency and percentage distribution. Moreover, the level of satisfaction towards both systems using mean and standard deviation. Moreover, the significant difference of the resulting overall mean used paired t- test. It involved the calculation of the frequency, mean and standard deviation and paired t-test. 235 respondents participated in this study which were identified through the use of stratified random sampling. The study having able to assess the overall satisfaction difference between the two services concluded high significant difference between the two system, with automation having higher satisfaction than the manual system. With the results in hand, the researchers would like to recommend to the school administrator to implement the library’s automated system services and to further improve the organization of books wherein they can be more accessible to the library users.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2025.v07i05.004
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elevating Satisfaction: Library System Impact on User Material Access and Satisfaction

Vallerie Joy T. Escolano, Aurora Faith Lancheta, Rigel Yestin Daggon, Lennard Jan Polentinos et al.
Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
article

Elevating Satisfaction: Library System Impact on User Material Access and Satisfaction

Vallerie Joy T. Escolano, Aurora Faith Lancheta, Rigel Yestin Daggon, Lennard Jan Polentinos, Allyssa Marielle Caluma, Shine Hernane, Maria Alyzandra
article en

Abstract

This study assessed the level of student satisfaction with the current manual borrowing system of the library in contrast to automation. It employed the quantitative type of research with a descriptive-comparative design. The study aimed to describe the respondents using frequency and percentage distribution. Moreover, the level of satisfaction towards both systems using mean and standard deviation. Moreover, the significant difference of the resulting overall mean used paired t- test. It involved the calculation of the frequency, mean and standard deviation and paired t-test. 235 respondents participated in this study which were identified through the use of stratified random sampling. The study having able to assess the overall satisfaction difference between the two services concluded high significant difference between the two system, with automation having higher satisfaction than the manual system. With the results in hand, the researchers would like to recommend to the school administrator to implement the library’s automated system services and to further improve the organization of books wherein they can be more accessible to the library users.

Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 7(05)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Elevating Satisfaction: Library System Impact on User Material Access and Satisfaction — Vallerie Joy T. Escolano, Aurora Faith Lancheta, et al. · Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS