Determining Relative Competence in Resolving Criminal Defamation Cases Under Indonesian Positive Law

The determination of relative competence in criminal cases is based on the court with geographical authority to adjudicate a particular case, as established through normative legal research. Relative competence is determined by the location where the crime occurred or the residence of the perpetrator and/or victim, as stipulated in Article 84 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code: “The competent district court is the court where the crime was committed.” In the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 283/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Jkt.Sel, although the crime occurred in Bogor, the case was tried in the South Jakarta District Court. The judge considered additional factors, such as the defendant’s place of residence or the case’s significant influence in the area. This demonstrates flexibility in applying relative competence while adhering to relevant legal provisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JIHK
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v6i2.235
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining Relative Competence in Resolving Criminal Defamation Cases Under Indonesian Positive Law

Rugun Romaida Hutabarat, Emeralda Janessa Josephine
1 citations
JIHK
Legal Studies and Policies
4.07
article

Determining Relative Competence in Resolving Criminal Defamation Cases Under Indonesian Positive Law

Rugun Romaida Hutabarat, Emeralda Janessa Josephine
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The determination of relative competence in criminal cases is based on the court with geographical authority to adjudicate a particular case, as established through normative legal research. Relative competence is determined by the location where the crime occurred or the residence of the perpetrator and/or victim, as stipulated in Article 84 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code: “The competent district court is the court where the crime was committed.” In the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 283/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Jkt.Sel, although the crime occurred in Bogor, the case was tried in the South Jakarta District Court. The judge considered additional factors, such as the defendant’s place of residence or the case’s significant influence in the area. This demonstrates flexibility in applying relative competence while adhering to relevant legal provisions.

JIHKVol. 6(2)
Tarumanagara University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Legal Studies and Policies
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Determining Relative Competence in Resolving Criminal Defamation Cases Under Indonesian Positive Law — Rugun Romaida Hutabarat, Emeralda Janessa Josephine · JIHK (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS