Validation of the Student and Teacher Version of the Japanese Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ)

Abstract: The present study analyzed students’ self-reports and teachers’ assessments using the Japanese version of the Perception of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ), which measures students’ emotional well-being, social inclusion, and academic self-concept. Data from 678 students (grades 5–9) and their 35 teachers were examined using classical test theory and item response theory. Categorical confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the three-dimensional structure of the PIQ for both the student and teacher versions. The measurement invariance was tested, and partial scalar invariance was established between primary and lower-secondary school students. A graded response model details item functionality across construct levels. A correlated trait-correlated method minus one (CT-C(M-1) model revealed that the consistency between the self-reports and teacher ratings was lower than the method-specificity of teacher ratings. The study underscores the value of using both classical test theory and item response theory for psychometric evaluations, thus proving the scale’s reliability and validity in Japanese schools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000914
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Student and Teacher Version of the Japanese Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ)

Susanne Schwab, Akie Yada, Kanako Korenaga, Carmen Zurbriggen
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
article

Validation of the Student and Teacher Version of the Japanese Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ)

Susanne Schwab, Akie Yada, Kanako Korenaga, Carmen Zurbriggen
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The present study analyzed students’ self-reports and teachers’ assessments using the Japanese version of the Perception of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ), which measures students’ emotional well-being, social inclusion, and academic self-concept. Data from 678 students (grades 5–9) and their 35 teachers were examined using classical test theory and item response theory. Categorical confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the three-dimensional structure of the PIQ for both the student and teacher versions. The measurement invariance was tested, and partial scalar invariance was established between primary and lower-secondary school students. A graded response model details item functionality across construct levels. A correlated trait-correlated method minus one (CT-C(M-1) model revealed that the consistency between the self-reports and teacher ratings was lower than the method-specificity of teacher ratings. The study underscores the value of using both classical test theory and item response theory for psychometric evaluations, thus proving the scale’s reliability and validity in Japanese schools.

European Journal of Psychological Assessment
University of Vienna (AT), University of Fribourg (CH), University of Turku (FI), North-West University (ZA), Kōchi University (JP), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation of the Student and Teacher Version of the Japanese Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ) — Susanne Schwab, Akie Yada, et al. · European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS