An AIoT enabled system for optimizing data retrieval in the intensive care unit evaluated in a randomized crossover pilot trial

Healthcare providers (HCPs) in the intensive care unit (ICU) frequently face information overload, which can result in cognitive fatigue and decision-making errors. This study compares the efficiency and accuracy of data collection between an artificial intelligence of things (AIoT)-enabled ICU command center (CC) and a hospital information system (HIS). A randomized crossover pilot trial was conducted with ICU-trained HCPs, who collected data from the most critically ill ICU patients, selected based on their Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (APACHE II) score, using either the CC-HIS or HIS-CC sequence. Data collection time, accuracy, and subgroup differences were evaluated. The effect of increased data volume on time and accuracy was also assessed. The study enrolled 21 HCPs to collect data from five ICU patients. After excluding incomplete or insufficient data, 184 data sets were analyzed. The results showed that the CC significantly reduced data collection time by 41.8% (p < 0.0001), with a mean reduction of 6.75 min per patient (8.5 vs. 15.2 min, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the CC improved data accuracy by 2.07% (93.8% vs. 95.9%, p = 0.0002). These findings indicate that the AIoT-enabled CC improves both the efficiency and accuracy in data collection in the ICU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19413-9
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An AIoT enabled system for optimizing data retrieval in the intensive care unit evaluated in a randomized crossover pilot trial

Chieh‐Lung Chen, Chih‐Yen Tu, Der‐Yang Cho, Yi‐Cheng Shen et al.
Scientific Reports
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

An AIoT enabled system for optimizing data retrieval in the intensive care unit evaluated in a randomized crossover pilot trial

Chieh‐Lung Chen, Chih‐Yen Tu, Der‐Yang Cho, Yi‐Cheng Shen, How-Yang Tseng, Chih‐Hao Chen, Chi‐Kang Teng, J. H. Lin, Wei-Cheng Chen, Wen-Sheng Feng, Yu-Chao Lin, YiJing Fu, Ching-Yao Chou, Wu‐Huei Hsu
article en

Abstract

Healthcare providers (HCPs) in the intensive care unit (ICU) frequently face information overload, which can result in cognitive fatigue and decision-making errors. This study compares the efficiency and accuracy of data collection between an artificial intelligence of things (AIoT)-enabled ICU command center (CC) and a hospital information system (HIS). A randomized crossover pilot trial was conducted with ICU-trained HCPs, who collected data from the most critically ill ICU patients, selected based on their Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (APACHE II) score, using either the CC-HIS or HIS-CC sequence. Data collection time, accuracy, and subgroup differences were evaluated. The effect of increased data volume on time and accuracy was also assessed. The study enrolled 21 HCPs to collect data from five ICU patients. After excluding incomplete or insufficient data, 184 data sets were analyzed. The results showed that the CC significantly reduced data collection time by 41.8% (p < 0.0001), with a mean reduction of 6.75 min per patient (8.5 vs. 15.2 min, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the CC improved data accuracy by 2.07% (93.8% vs. 95.9%, p = 0.0002). These findings indicate that the AIoT-enabled CC improves both the efficiency and accuracy in data collection in the ICU.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
China Medical University (TW), China Medical University Hospital (TW), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, National Science and Technology Council, Division of Materials Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.