Same same but different: Threat expectancy change and fear reduction as readouts of exposure rationales are only weakly associated and contribute differentially to treatment outcome in anxiety disorders

Responses to exposure therapy vary across individuals, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of its underlying mechanisms. This study examined two key processes during exposure that serve as readouts of different clinical rationales: (1) within-session fear reduction (measured as the decline from peak to end fear within an exposure exercise) and (2) threat expectancy processes (assessed via expectancy violation, expectancy change, and learning rate). Data from 516 patients with anxiety disorders who completed at least 10 exposure exercises in a clinical trial were analyzed. Results showed that expectancy measures and fear reduction were only weakly correlated within exposure exercises. While no significant differences were found in their time courses, both readouts independently predicted treatment success. Specifically, a higher learning rate and greater relative fear reduction were associated with better outcomes. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of monitoring fear reduction and expectancy-related readouts as indicators of two distinct exposure rationales - the fear reduction rationale and the threat expectancy rationale. Although it remains unclear whether they reflect separate mechanisms of change or different aspects of a shared mechanism, addressing both rationales may help optimize and personalize exposure therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2025.104856
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Same same but different: Threat expectancy change and fear reduction as readouts of exposure rationales are only weakly associated and contribute differentially to treatment outcome in anxiety disorders

Katharina Domschke, Andre Pittig, Paul Pauli, Ingmar Heinig et al.
1 citations
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
2.12
article

Same same but different: Threat expectancy change and fear reduction as readouts of exposure rationales are only weakly associated and contribute differentially to treatment outcome in anxiety disorders

Katharina Domschke, Andre Pittig, Paul Pauli, Ingmar Heinig, Ulrike Lueken, Silvia Schneider, Katja Koelkebeck, Maike Hollandt, Jan Richter, Alfons O. Hamm, Thomas Fydrich, Jürgen Margraf, Jürgen Deckert, Benjamin Straube, Stephan A. Goerigk, Christina Totzeck, Winfried Rief, Andreas Ströhle, Udo Dannlowski, Tilo T. J. Kircher, Peter Neudeck, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Jürgen Hoyer, Volker Arolt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Responses to exposure therapy vary across individuals, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of its underlying mechanisms. This study examined two key processes during exposure that serve as readouts of different clinical rationales: (1) within-session fear reduction (measured as the decline from peak to end fear within an exposure exercise) and (2) threat expectancy processes (assessed via expectancy violation, expectancy change, and learning rate). Data from 516 patients with anxiety disorders who completed at least 10 exposure exercises in a clinical trial were analyzed. Results showed that expectancy measures and fear reduction were only weakly correlated within exposure exercises. While no significant differences were found in their time courses, both readouts independently predicted treatment success. Specifically, a higher learning rate and greater relative fear reduction were associated with better outcomes. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of monitoring fear reduction and expectancy-related readouts as indicators of two distinct exposure rationales - the fear reduction rationale and the threat expectancy rationale. Although it remains unclear whether they reflect separate mechanisms of change or different aspects of a shared mechanism, addressing both rationales may help optimize and personalize exposure therapy.

Behaviour Research and TherapyVol. 194
University of Hildesheim (DE), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), University of Cologne (DE), University of Münster (DE), University of Würzburg (DE), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Universität Greifswald (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Bethel University (US), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.