Weighing Open Science Against Research Participation Burden in Informed Consent: A Randomized Pilot Study

Deciding to participate in clinical research requires patients to evaluate various trial characteristics. This survey study measured the influence of trial characteristics (visit volume and open data sharing) on willingness to participate in patients with Parkinson's disease. Patients were randomized to either evaluate two trials (joint condition) or a single trial (separate condition). For patients who evaluated both trials, willingness to participate was greater in the restricted science protocol with fewer visits (7.60 vs. 7.12; mean difference, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.14). Patients who evaluated both trials were less willing to participate in the study involving more visits than patients who only evaluated the study involving more visits (7.12 vs. 8.14; mean difference, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.74). Patients have difficulty evaluating information about open science and visit burden when information is presented separately. Although views toward open science were favorable, preferences for fewer visits dominated decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251384573
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighing Open Science Against Research Participation Burden in Informed Consent: A Randomized Pilot Study

Patrick Bodilly Kane, Jonathan Kimmelman, Renata Iskander, Madeleine E. Sharp
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Weighing Open Science Against Research Participation Burden in Informed Consent: A Randomized Pilot Study

Patrick Bodilly Kane, Jonathan Kimmelman, Renata Iskander, Madeleine E. Sharp
article en

Abstract

Deciding to participate in clinical research requires patients to evaluate various trial characteristics. This survey study measured the influence of trial characteristics (visit volume and open data sharing) on willingness to participate in patients with Parkinson's disease. Patients were randomized to either evaluate two trials (joint condition) or a single trial (separate condition). For patients who evaluated both trials, willingness to participate was greater in the restricted science protocol with fewer visits (7.60 vs. 7.12; mean difference, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.14). Patients who evaluated both trials were less willing to participate in the study involving more visits than patients who only evaluated the study involving more visits (7.12 vs. 8.14; mean difference, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.74). Patients have difficulty evaluating information about open science and visit burden when information is presented separately. Although views toward open science were favorable, preferences for fewer visits dominated decisions.

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research EthicsVol. 20(5)
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Weighing Open Science Against Research Participation Burden in Informed Consent: A Randomized Pilot Study — Patrick Bodilly Kane, Jonathan Kimmelman, et al. · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS