Surpassing the Silence of the DSM: Discussion on the Digital Trade Dispute Resolution Path for China and the Global South Countries under the Paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body

Since the appointment of new appellate judges by the World Trade Organization (WTO) was banned in 2019, the paralysis of the appellate body has seriously damaged the Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM), leaving a gap in resolving the escalating digital services trade disputes involving complex issues such as data flow and algorithm governance, and the existing WTO rules have failed to fully address these problems. Although MPIA offers a temporary alternative, its limited membership, uncertain executability, and untested applicability to new types of digital disputes make it inadequate. Meanwhile, the rising technological nationalism and fragmented regulations (such as the GDPR and the CLOUD Act) have exacerbated the global digital governance divide, marginalizing China and the countries in the Global South. This article analyzes the decline of DSM, highlighting the eroded rule predictability and legal fragmentation, and critically assesses the limitations of MPIA and the deficiencies of the traditional WTO framework in disputes such as data localization. A series of cases has revealed the trends of “pre-dispute governance” and unilateralism. In the face of this dual crisis, this article holds that China and the Global South must embark on a path of transformation from “system participants” to “system shapers,” rather than merely conforming. The strategies it explores include leveraging domestic regulations (such as data outbound security assessment), promoting regional cooperation (such as the mediation mechanism of RCEP), and advancing initiatives like the Global Data Security Initiative. This dual approach of maintaining “policy sovereignty” and establishing “compliance sovereignty” aims to ensure institutional autonomy, enhance rule-making capabilities, and establish a fairer, rule-based digital trade order in the context of DSM paralysis and regulatory fragmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26689/pbes.v8i5.12118
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surpassing the Silence of the DSM: Discussion on the Digital Trade Dispute Resolution Path for China and the Global South Countries under the Paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body

Xiaochun Yu
Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies
World Trade Organization Law
article

Surpassing the Silence of the DSM: Discussion on the Digital Trade Dispute Resolution Path for China and the Global South Countries under the Paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body

Xiaochun Yu
article en

Abstract

Since the appointment of new appellate judges by the World Trade Organization (WTO) was banned in 2019, the paralysis of the appellate body has seriously damaged the Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM), leaving a gap in resolving the escalating digital services trade disputes involving complex issues such as data flow and algorithm governance, and the existing WTO rules have failed to fully address these problems. Although MPIA offers a temporary alternative, its limited membership, uncertain executability, and untested applicability to new types of digital disputes make it inadequate. Meanwhile, the rising technological nationalism and fragmented regulations (such as the GDPR and the CLOUD Act) have exacerbated the global digital governance divide, marginalizing China and the countries in the Global South. This article analyzes the decline of DSM, highlighting the eroded rule predictability and legal fragmentation, and critically assesses the limitations of MPIA and the deficiencies of the traditional WTO framework in disputes such as data localization. A series of cases has revealed the trends of “pre-dispute governance” and unilateralism. In the face of this dual crisis, this article holds that China and the Global South must embark on a path of transformation from “system participants” to “system shapers,” rather than merely conforming. The strategies it explores include leveraging domestic regulations (such as data outbound security assessment), promoting regional cooperation (such as the mediation mechanism of RCEP), and advancing initiatives like the Global Data Security Initiative. This dual approach of maintaining “policy sovereignty” and establishing “compliance sovereignty” aims to ensure institutional autonomy, enhance rule-making capabilities, and establish a fairer, rule-based digital trade order in the context of DSM paralysis and regulatory fragmentation.

Proceedings of Business and Economic StudiesVol. 8(5)
University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.