Auriga Streams III: the mass–metallicity relation does not rule out tidal mass-loss in Local Group satellites

ABSTRACT The mass–metallicity relation is a fundamental galaxy scaling law that has been extended to the faintest systems in the Local Group. We show that the small scatter in this relation, which has been used to argue against tidal mass-loss in Local Group satellites, is consistent with the level of disruption in the Auriga simulations. For every accreted system in Auriga, we compute stellar masses and metallicities two ways: considering the total system (bound + lost material) and only considering the progenitor. Accreted systems in Auriga have a tight relation between total stellar mass and metallicity, with scatter at a fixed stellar mass driven by age. When only considering the progenitor, the tidally evolved mass–metallicity relation has similar scatter ($\sim$0.27 dex) as observed for the Local Group satellites ($\sim$0.23 dex). Satellites that lie above the evolved relation have experienced substantial mass-loss and typically have low metallicity for their total stellar mass. Even satellites that fall exactly on the evolved relation can lose over half of their stellar mass. Only satellites substantially below the evolved relation are reliably intact. Based on their offset from the observed relation, we predict which Milky Way and M31 satellites have tidal tails waiting to be discovered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag029
Primary Topic
Geological formations and processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auriga Streams III: the mass–metallicity relation does not rule out tidal mass-loss in Local Group satellites

Alexander H. Riley, Rebekka Bieri, Francesca Fragkoudi, Robert J. J. Grand et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Geological formations and processes
article

Auriga Streams III: the mass–metallicity relation does not rule out tidal mass-loss in Local Group satellites

Alexander H. Riley, Rebekka Bieri, Francesca Fragkoudi, Robert J. J. Grand, Federico Marinacci, Facundo A. Gómez, Nora Shipp, Christine M. Simpson, Alis J. Deason
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The mass–metallicity relation is a fundamental galaxy scaling law that has been extended to the faintest systems in the Local Group. We show that the small scatter in this relation, which has been used to argue against tidal mass-loss in Local Group satellites, is consistent with the level of disruption in the Auriga simulations. For every accreted system in Auriga, we compute stellar masses and metallicities two ways: considering the total system (bound + lost material) and only considering the progenitor. Accreted systems in Auriga have a tight relation between total stellar mass and metallicity, with scatter at a fixed stellar mass driven by age. When only considering the progenitor, the tidally evolved mass–metallicity relation has similar scatter ($\sim$0.27 dex) as observed for the Local Group satellites ($\sim$0.23 dex). Satellites that lie above the evolved relation have experienced substantial mass-loss and typically have low metallicity for their total stellar mass. Even satellites that fall exactly on the evolved relation can lose over half of their stellar mass. Only satellites substantially below the evolved relation are reliably intact. Based on their offset from the observed relation, we predict which Milky Way and M31 satellites have tidal tails waiting to be discovered.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 546(3)
Argonne National Laboratory (US), Lund University (SE), Durham University (GB), University of Washington (US), University of Zurich (CH), Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica di Bologna (IT), GNA University (IN), Seattle University (US), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), University of La Serena (CL), National Institute for Astrophysics (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Geological formations and processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.