Critical Exchanges: Globalizing Comparative Musicology?

ABSTRACT This contribution follows the journal's ‘Critical Exchanges' format to offer a dialogue between a ‘historical musicologist' and an ‘ethnomusicologist' focused on comparative musicology and its legacy in relation to recent debates about global music history. In contrast to Western-centric examinations of the history of comparative musicology, we discuss the practice of comparative musicology in Japan and the Ottoman Empire and Turkish Republic during the first half of the twentieth century. The geographical foci of our case studies reflect not only our research interests but also the historical connectedness of Japan, Ottoman Turkey, and Germany, as empires and as post-imperial spectres of those empires. Turning to current discourses on global music history, then, we end by critically engaging with the concepts of entanglement and ‘Asia as method’. Ultimately, we ask how an understanding of the interactions between global manifestations of authoritarianism and anti-imperialism might inform current debates about decolonization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Music and Letters
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcaf044
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musicology and Musical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Exchanges: Globalizing Comparative Musicology?

Amanda Hsieh, Jacob Olley
1 citations
Music and Letters
Musicology and Musical Analysis
19.03
article

Critical Exchanges: Globalizing Comparative Musicology?

Amanda Hsieh, Jacob Olley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This contribution follows the journal's ‘Critical Exchanges' format to offer a dialogue between a ‘historical musicologist' and an ‘ethnomusicologist' focused on comparative musicology and its legacy in relation to recent debates about global music history. In contrast to Western-centric examinations of the history of comparative musicology, we discuss the practice of comparative musicology in Japan and the Ottoman Empire and Turkish Republic during the first half of the twentieth century. The geographical foci of our case studies reflect not only our research interests but also the historical connectedness of Japan, Ottoman Turkey, and Germany, as empires and as post-imperial spectres of those empires. Turning to current discourses on global music history, then, we end by critically engaging with the concepts of entanglement and ‘Asia as method’. Ultimately, we ask how an understanding of the interactions between global manifestations of authoritarianism and anti-imperialism might inform current debates about decolonization.

Music and LettersVol. 106(3)
UK Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Musicology and Musical Analysis
19.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critical Exchanges: Globalizing Comparative Musicology? — Amanda Hsieh, Jacob Olley · Music and Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS