On proximity—exploring experiences of bias and discrimination in digital humanities

Abstract This article explores proximity as a critical feminist methodology in digital humanities, emphasizing its role in addressing bias in digital technologies. Drawing on the insights of Virginia Eubanks and Ruha Benjamin, this article argues that those closest to systemic issues possess essential knowledge for creating equitable solutions and advocates for community-led, inclusive approaches to digital humanities research. Full Stack Feminism in Digital Humanities (FSF) project, a UK–Ireland collaboration that employed proximity as both a methodological and ethical framework, is offered as a case study, and as such, the article draws on an analysis of semi-structured interviews, carried out by Full Stack Feminism. In line with the proximal approach, interviews were conducted with community groups and organizations as well as researchers, academics, artists, coders, activists, and software developers. By centring marginalized voices, the article proposes a proximal approach as a means to counteract digital bias and foster more just digital landscapes. It aligns with bell hooks’ (1989) and Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein calls for counter-hegemonic practices rooted in the politics of location.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf092
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On proximity—exploring experiences of bias and discrimination in digital humanities

Jeneen Naji, Sharon Webb, Izzy Fox
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

On proximity—exploring experiences of bias and discrimination in digital humanities

Jeneen Naji, Sharon Webb, Izzy Fox
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores proximity as a critical feminist methodology in digital humanities, emphasizing its role in addressing bias in digital technologies. Drawing on the insights of Virginia Eubanks and Ruha Benjamin, this article argues that those closest to systemic issues possess essential knowledge for creating equitable solutions and advocates for community-led, inclusive approaches to digital humanities research. Full Stack Feminism in Digital Humanities (FSF) project, a UK–Ireland collaboration that employed proximity as both a methodological and ethical framework, is offered as a case study, and as such, the article draws on an analysis of semi-structured interviews, carried out by Full Stack Feminism. In line with the proximal approach, interviews were conducted with community groups and organizations as well as researchers, academics, artists, coders, activists, and software developers. By centring marginalized voices, the article proposes a proximal approach as a means to counteract digital bias and foster more just digital landscapes. It aligns with bell hooks’ (1989) and Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein calls for counter-hegemonic practices rooted in the politics of location.

Digital Scholarship in the HumanitiesVol. 40(4)
National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), University of Sussex (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Irish Research Council, Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.