ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING CRIMINAL VERDICT FOR THE CRIMINAL ACT OF RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS (Study of Decision Number 155/Pid.B/20245/PN. Sei Rampah)

The regulation of receiving the proceeds of theft according to the law in force in Indonesia is regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code and the factors causing the receiving of the proceeds of theft are due to economic and financial factors. The economic life of the perpetrator who is less able both in terms of economy and education. Economic factors are the most important element and apply generally to almost every case of receiving the proceeds of theft, so this factor is not too tied to the perpetrator, time, and place. Based on the research results, it is known that efforts to overcome the reception of the proceeds of theft are pre-emptive efforts, repressive efforts, and preventive efforts. The judge's legal considerations in Decision Number 155 / Pid.B / 2024 / PN. Sei Rampah are that all elements of 480 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code have been fulfilled and there are no justifications and excuses, so that they are found guilty, as well as aggravating and mitigating factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Meta Hukum
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v4i2.762
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING CRIMINAL VERDICT FOR THE CRIMINAL ACT OF RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS (Study of Decision Number 155/Pid.B/20245/PN. Sei Rampah)

Herlina Hanum Harahap, Suharman Suharman
Jurnal Meta Hukum
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING CRIMINAL VERDICT FOR THE CRIMINAL ACT OF RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS (Study of Decision Number 155/Pid.B/20245/PN. Sei Rampah)

Herlina Hanum Harahap, Suharman Suharman
article en

Abstract

The regulation of receiving the proceeds of theft according to the law in force in Indonesia is regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code and the factors causing the receiving of the proceeds of theft are due to economic and financial factors. The economic life of the perpetrator who is less able both in terms of economy and education. Economic factors are the most important element and apply generally to almost every case of receiving the proceeds of theft, so this factor is not too tied to the perpetrator, time, and place. Based on the research results, it is known that efforts to overcome the reception of the proceeds of theft are pre-emptive efforts, repressive efforts, and preventive efforts. The judge's legal considerations in Decision Number 155 / Pid.B / 2024 / PN. Sei Rampah are that all elements of 480 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code have been fulfilled and there are no justifications and excuses, so that they are found guilty, as well as aggravating and mitigating factors.

Jurnal Meta HukumVol. 4(2)
Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING CRIMINAL VERDICT FOR THE CRIMINAL ACT OF RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS (Study of Decision Number 155/Pid.B/20245/PN. Sei Rampah) — Herlina Hanum Harahap, Suharman Suharman · Jurnal Meta Hukum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS