When Hurricanes Rewrite Balance Sheets: The Climate Adaptation Paradox in Corporate Resilience

ABSTRACT When Hurricane Harvey struck Houston in 2017, companies with seemingly identical business models experienced dramatically different outcomes, exposing critical gaps in understanding how extreme climate events affect corporate performance through complex transmission mechanisms. Using panel data from 1517 Chinese A‐share listed companies (2013–2023), we employ fixed‐effects regression with instrumental variables to examine these pathways. Results show extreme climate risk significantly reduces financial performance, yet operates through three transmission mechanisms creating measurable benefits: green innovation intensity, environmental governance investment, and social responsibility investment generate positive returns that partially offset direct climate damages. Supply chain localization provides protection by enabling better coordination during disruptions, while ESG transparency gaps amplify vulnerability through damaged stakeholder trust. These findings reveal the climate adaptation paradox—resilience depends less on geographic location than on strategic positioning within innovation ecosystems, governance structures, and stakeholder networks, where adaptation represents risk mitigation rather than value creation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70309
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Hurricanes Rewrite Balance Sheets: The Climate Adaptation Paradox in Corporate Resilience

Xue Lei
3 citations
Sustainable Development
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
6.68
article

When Hurricanes Rewrite Balance Sheets: The Climate Adaptation Paradox in Corporate Resilience

Xue Lei
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT When Hurricane Harvey struck Houston in 2017, companies with seemingly identical business models experienced dramatically different outcomes, exposing critical gaps in understanding how extreme climate events affect corporate performance through complex transmission mechanisms. Using panel data from 1517 Chinese A‐share listed companies (2013–2023), we employ fixed‐effects regression with instrumental variables to examine these pathways. Results show extreme climate risk significantly reduces financial performance, yet operates through three transmission mechanisms creating measurable benefits: green innovation intensity, environmental governance investment, and social responsibility investment generate positive returns that partially offset direct climate damages. Supply chain localization provides protection by enabling better coordination during disruptions, while ESG transparency gaps amplify vulnerability through damaged stakeholder trust. These findings reveal the climate adaptation paradox—resilience depends less on geographic location than on strategic positioning within innovation ecosystems, governance structures, and stakeholder networks, where adaptation represents risk mitigation rather than value creation.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 34(1)
Shanghai University (CN), Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.