Discussion on the Institutional Restructuring of General Education Curriculum Organization: A Case Study of H University

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the organization of H University’s general education curriculum, identify structural issues, and propose directions for restructuring. Method: Using H University in Seoul as a single case, all general education courses in 2024-2025, along with curriculum tables, catalogs, and syllabi, were examined through document analysis. The analysis focused on curriculum structure, credit requirements, subject distribution, academic characteristics, major relevance, and appropriateness. Results: The curriculum was overly complex, with excessive required credits limiting choice, insufficient natural science and mathematics offerings, and courses misaligned with general education goals. Courses were grouped into four types: major-infiltrated, structurally residual, gap-filling, and functionally instrumental. Conclusion: General education should be reorganized through functional relocation and reallocation, ensuring broader student choice, disciplinary balance, and clearer relationships among general education, majors, and academic foundations.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23108/decrc.2025.7.3.181
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussion on the Institutional Restructuring of General Education Curriculum Organization: A Case Study of H University

Han-Joon Yoo, Suyeon Gena Kim
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

Discussion on the Institutional Restructuring of General Education Curriculum Organization: A Case Study of H University

Han-Joon Yoo, Suyeon Gena Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the organization of H University’s general education curriculum, identify structural issues, and propose directions for restructuring. Method: Using H University in Seoul as a single case, all general education courses in 2024-2025, along with curriculum tables, catalogs, and syllabi, were examined through document analysis. The analysis focused on curriculum structure, credit requirements, subject distribution, academic characteristics, major relevance, and appropriateness. Results: The curriculum was overly complex, with excessive required credits limiting choice, insufficient natural science and mathematics offerings, and courses misaligned with general education goals. Courses were grouped into four types: major-infiltrated, structurally residual, gap-filling, and functionally instrumental. Conclusion: General education should be reorganized through functional relocation and reallocation, ensuring broader student choice, disciplinary balance, and clearer relationships among general education, majors, and academic foundations.

Vol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.