A contrastive study on the ‘jal’-type property passive sentences in Korean and the ‘NP+hǎo-V’ constructions in Chinese

Both the Korean “jal”-type property passive sentences and the Chinese ‘NP+hǎo-V constructions can express the inherent property of the subject and share syntactic and semantic similarities, such as the use of the patient as the grammatical subject. This study aims to examine the syntactic and semantic features of the Korean “jal”-type property passives sentences and the Chinese ‘NP+hǎo-V constructions to conduct a contrastive analysis between these two contrastive items. The goal of this study is to identify and clarify the similarities and differences in their syntactic and semantic characteristics. Both constructions exhibit characteristics of middle sentences such as the presence of an implicit agent, the existence of a modifying element. The most significant difference between these two constructions in the presence or absence of an explicit passive marker.

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17296/korbil.2025..101.235
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A contrastive study on the ‘jal’-type property passive sentences in Korean and the ‘NP+hǎo-V’ constructions in Chinese

Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

A contrastive study on the ‘jal’-type property passive sentences in Korean and the ‘NP+hǎo-V’ constructions in Chinese

article en

Abstract

Both the Korean “jal”-type property passive sentences and the Chinese ‘NP+hǎo-V constructions can express the inherent property of the subject and share syntactic and semantic similarities, such as the use of the patient as the grammatical subject. This study aims to examine the syntactic and semantic features of the Korean “jal”-type property passives sentences and the Chinese ‘NP+hǎo-V constructions to conduct a contrastive analysis between these two contrastive items. The goal of this study is to identify and clarify the similarities and differences in their syntactic and semantic characteristics. Both constructions exhibit characteristics of middle sentences such as the presence of an implicit agent, the existence of a modifying element. The most significant difference between these two constructions in the presence or absence of an explicit passive marker.

Vol. 101
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.