Comparative Study on the Performance of Imbalanced Multi-Class Classification Using Oversampling and Machine Learning

This study aimed to address the data imbalance problem, which often deteriorates the prediction performance of minority classes in multi-class classification using educational data. To this end, the performance of 48 classification models combining six oversampling techniques (RandomOverSampler, SMOTE, BorderlineSMOTE, ADASYN, SMOTE+ENN, SMOTE+Tomek) and eight machine learning algorithms (CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, RandomForest, ExtraTrees, LogisticRegression, SVM, KNN) was compared. Using data from the Multicultural Adolescents Panel Study (MAPS), adolescents were classified into groups based on their career competency levels. The results revealed that the CatBoost model combined with RandomOverSampler achieved the highest performance across key evaluation metrics, including Accuracy, Macro F1, Macro Recall, and MMCC. Based on this optimal model, the top 10% (18 variables) of important predictors were extracted using SHAP, permutation importance, and impurity-based importance methods, and a visual analysis of predictive contributions and nonlinear relationships for seven core variables commonly identified across all three approaches was conducted. The findings indicated that individual psychological and behavioral factors—such as self-esteem, career decision-making attitudes, preparedness for higher education, and peer relationships—were the most influential predictors of career competency types. This study provides a methodological foundation for early identification of vulnerable groups and the development of tailored career support systems.

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Society for Educational Evaluation
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31158/jeev.2025.38.3.623
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on the Performance of Imbalanced Multi-Class Classification Using Oversampling and Machine Learning

Korean Society for Educational Evaluation
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

Comparative Study on the Performance of Imbalanced Multi-Class Classification Using Oversampling and Machine Learning

article en

Abstract

This study aimed to address the data imbalance problem, which often deteriorates the prediction performance of minority classes in multi-class classification using educational data. To this end, the performance of 48 classification models combining six oversampling techniques (RandomOverSampler, SMOTE, BorderlineSMOTE, ADASYN, SMOTE+ENN, SMOTE+Tomek) and eight machine learning algorithms (CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, RandomForest, ExtraTrees, LogisticRegression, SVM, KNN) was compared. Using data from the Multicultural Adolescents Panel Study (MAPS), adolescents were classified into groups based on their career competency levels. The results revealed that the CatBoost model combined with RandomOverSampler achieved the highest performance across key evaluation metrics, including Accuracy, Macro F1, Macro Recall, and MMCC. Based on this optimal model, the top 10% (18 variables) of important predictors were extracted using SHAP, permutation importance, and impurity-based importance methods, and a visual analysis of predictive contributions and nonlinear relationships for seven core variables commonly identified across all three approaches was conducted. The findings indicated that individual psychological and behavioral factors—such as self-esteem, career decision-making attitudes, preparedness for higher education, and peer relationships—were the most influential predictors of career competency types. This study provides a methodological foundation for early identification of vulnerable groups and the development of tailored career support systems.

Korean Society for Educational EvaluationVol. 38(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.