Predicting mathematics achievement using process data: A comparison of linear regression and random forest

This study aimed to construct a predictive model of mathematics achievement using computer-based assessment data from the mathematics domain of PISA 2022 in Korea. The model incorporated process data derived from item characteristics (cognitive level, item type, discrimination, and difficulty) along with learner background variables. Six models were developed: model 1 included only background variables; models 2 to 5 included background variables and process data based on a single item characteristic; and model 6 combined all variables. Linear regression and random forest algorithms were applied to compare predictive performance and identify key predictors. The results showed that random forest outperformed linear regression overall, and models 2 to 5 were selected as final models. The most important predictors included process data, mathematics self-efficacy, and socioeconomic and cultural status, demonstrating the effectiveness of process data in predicting mathematics achievement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Society for Educational Evaluation
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31158/jeev.2025.38.3.557
Primary Topic
Educational Technology and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting mathematics achievement using process data: A comparison of linear regression and random forest

Yejin Woo, Y. Choi
Korean Society for Educational Evaluation
Educational Technology and Assessment
article

Predicting mathematics achievement using process data: A comparison of linear regression and random forest

Yejin Woo, Y. Choi
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to construct a predictive model of mathematics achievement using computer-based assessment data from the mathematics domain of PISA 2022 in Korea. The model incorporated process data derived from item characteristics (cognitive level, item type, discrimination, and difficulty) along with learner background variables. Six models were developed: model 1 included only background variables; models 2 to 5 included background variables and process data based on a single item characteristic; and model 6 combined all variables. Linear regression and random forest algorithms were applied to compare predictive performance and identify key predictors. The results showed that random forest outperformed linear regression overall, and models 2 to 5 were selected as final models. The most important predictors included process data, mathematics self-efficacy, and socioeconomic and cultural status, demonstrating the effectiveness of process data in predicting mathematics achievement.

Korean Society for Educational EvaluationVol. 38(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Educational Technology and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.