Traditional vs. AI-based Methods for Detection of Anomalies on Metal Surfaces

Anomalies are data that deviate significantly from expected patterns, often indicating defects or irregularities.Detecting such anomalies is especially important in manufacturing, where visual anomaly detection (VAD) based on image data plays an essential role in quality control.By automating defect detection, VAD greatly reduces the time and costs associated with manual inspections.This has led to extensive research and the development of various approaches.While modern methods rely on deep learning (DL) techniques, earlier approaches are based on simpler statistical analyses.This paper examines whether deep learning is necessary for detecting simple defects, such as scratches on metal surfaces.The results show that while AI-based methods achieve near-perfect detection accuracy, traditional methods using simple statistical features can still reach up to 89% accuracy.Additionally, these traditional approaches are far more efficient, requiring only a fraction of the inference time.This highlights their potential as a lightweight and effective solution, particularly in real-time or resource-constrained scenarios.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-94-3281-3_esrel-sra-e2025-p5342-cd
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditional vs. AI-based Methods for Detection of Anomalies on Metal Surfaces

Marcin Hinz, Jonas Strohhofer
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Traditional vs. AI-based Methods for Detection of Anomalies on Metal Surfaces

Marcin Hinz, Jonas Strohhofer
article en

Abstract

Anomalies are data that deviate significantly from expected patterns, often indicating defects or irregularities.Detecting such anomalies is especially important in manufacturing, where visual anomaly detection (VAD) based on image data plays an essential role in quality control.By automating defect detection, VAD greatly reduces the time and costs associated with manual inspections.This has led to extensive research and the development of various approaches.While modern methods rely on deep learning (DL) techniques, earlier approaches are based on simpler statistical analyses.This paper examines whether deep learning is necessary for detecting simple defects, such as scratches on metal surfaces.The results show that while AI-based methods achieve near-perfect detection accuracy, traditional methods using simple statistical features can still reach up to 89% accuracy.Additionally, these traditional approaches are far more efficient, requiring only a fraction of the inference time.This highlights their potential as a lightweight and effective solution, particularly in real-time or resource-constrained scenarios.

Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Traditional vs. AI-based Methods for Detection of Anomalies on Metal Surfaces — Marcin Hinz, Jonas Strohhofer · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS