Safe AI vs Safe Use of AI

Recent advances in the development of AI has, predictably, led to a massive increase in research on how to make AI safe.While this is a valid and important quest, this paper emphasizes the difference between requiring an AI to be safe, and that AI is used safely.Using AI to control a system with potentially serious safety risks, even with the goal of making the system safer through the use of AI, doesn't necessarily imply that the AI itself must be safe.Focusing too much on making AI safe could result in a two-fold problem: 1) We cannot fully utilize the potential of AI; (because) 2) We struggle with demonstrating adequate safety for the AI.It is our opinion that problem 2 often can be avoided, and problem 1 alleviated because problem 2 is not relevant.This, however, requires a somewhat different way of thinking about AI in safety-critical systems than seems often to be the case.In this paper we discuss these problems, illustrate them with examples, and show that there is already much knowledge on how to achieve documented safety of AI-enabled systems without having to provide safety assurance for the AI itself.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-94-3281-3_esrel-sra-e2025-p7886-cd
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safe AI vs Safe Use of AI

Rune Winther, Rune Fredriksen
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Safe AI vs Safe Use of AI

Rune Winther, Rune Fredriksen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recent advances in the development of AI has, predictably, led to a massive increase in research on how to make AI safe.While this is a valid and important quest, this paper emphasizes the difference between requiring an AI to be safe, and that AI is used safely.Using AI to control a system with potentially serious safety risks, even with the goal of making the system safer through the use of AI, doesn't necessarily imply that the AI itself must be safe.Focusing too much on making AI safe could result in a two-fold problem: 1) We cannot fully utilize the potential of AI; (because) 2) We struggle with demonstrating adequate safety for the AI.It is our opinion that problem 2 often can be avoided, and problem 1 alleviated because problem 2 is not relevant.This, however, requires a somewhat different way of thinking about AI in safety-critical systems than seems often to be the case.In this paper we discuss these problems, illustrate them with examples, and show that there is already much knowledge on how to achieve documented safety of AI-enabled systems without having to provide safety assurance for the AI itself.

Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safe AI vs Safe Use of AI — Rune Winther, Rune Fredriksen · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS