Integrating Risk Estimates into the Planning of Preventive Maintenance for Large Portfolios of Bridges

Road managers must anticipate preventive maintenance intervention needs for all bridges in their network.This must be done years ahead of time, so that there is sufficient time to perform the appropriate detailed investigations of the structures by engineering offices, to combine with the interventions on other objects and schedule them, to obtain financing, and to prepare projects.Preventive maintenance interventions are, however, not always executed at the optimal time due to multiple factors, including variability in early overviews of upcoming intervention needs, lack of resources to conduct detailed investigations and lack of resources to carry out the interventions.Consequently, some interventions are executed earlier than required and some later, leading to either higher than necessary expenditures or higher than necessary risks.While existing bridge management systems do an admirable job in predicting when future interventions are required, there is potential to improve how they can help determine which investigations or interventions are to be postponed if necessary.The work presented in this paper meets this challenge by demonstrating how standardized overviews of bridge related risks could be integrated into these systems, where the risk estimates are made using fault trees and standardized estimates of probabilities and consequences of base events.The top events of the fault trees are servicerelated events associated with the detection of situations related to bridges that would cause interruptions to service, e.g., the discovery of an excessively large crack that would cause a manager to reduce traffic loads on the bridge until at least detailed engineering investigations could be conducted.The consequences for each top event are approximated using parameters that enable quick estimation for all bridges in a network, e.g., the expected user costs because of increased travel time due to traffic deviations.The method is demonstrated on four highway bridges in Switzerland.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-94-3281-3_esrel-sra-e2025-p2915-cd
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Risk Estimates into the Planning of Preventive Maintenance for Large Portfolios of Bridges

Bryan T. Adey, Simon Hässig, Jeremy D. Meier, Rade Hajdin
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
article

Integrating Risk Estimates into the Planning of Preventive Maintenance for Large Portfolios of Bridges

Bryan T. Adey, Simon Hässig, Jeremy D. Meier, Rade Hajdin
article en

Abstract

Road managers must anticipate preventive maintenance intervention needs for all bridges in their network.This must be done years ahead of time, so that there is sufficient time to perform the appropriate detailed investigations of the structures by engineering offices, to combine with the interventions on other objects and schedule them, to obtain financing, and to prepare projects.Preventive maintenance interventions are, however, not always executed at the optimal time due to multiple factors, including variability in early overviews of upcoming intervention needs, lack of resources to conduct detailed investigations and lack of resources to carry out the interventions.Consequently, some interventions are executed earlier than required and some later, leading to either higher than necessary expenditures or higher than necessary risks.While existing bridge management systems do an admirable job in predicting when future interventions are required, there is potential to improve how they can help determine which investigations or interventions are to be postponed if necessary.The work presented in this paper meets this challenge by demonstrating how standardized overviews of bridge related risks could be integrated into these systems, where the risk estimates are made using fault trees and standardized estimates of probabilities and consequences of base events.The top events of the fault trees are servicerelated events associated with the detection of situations related to bridges that would cause interruptions to service, e.g., the discovery of an excessively large crack that would cause a manager to reduce traffic loads on the bridge until at least detailed engineering investigations could be conducted.The consequences for each top event are approximated using parameters that enable quick estimation for all bridges in a network, e.g., the expected user costs because of increased travel time due to traffic deviations.The method is demonstrated on four highway bridges in Switzerland.

University of Belgrade (RS), Infrastructure Management Consultants (Switzerland) (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.