Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Probability for Impact Resistance of Safety Guards

The article examines the testing method described in Annex B of the ISO 14120 standard for assessing the impact resistance of machine guards.The typical testing practice involves firing a single shot from a ballistic cannon at the guard, with sensors measuring the projectile's velocity before and after impact.However, meeting the guidelines for this test presents challenges, including the difficulty of identifying and hitting the "weakest point" of the guard and ensuring the projectile strikes the surface in a perpendicular manner.The key findings, derived from a five-year collaboration between two research institutions, focus on analyzing uncertainties inherent in these standardized testing methods.Two statistical distributions, Logistic and Gaussian, are employed to process the data.The traditional approach of creating a histogram before calculating the cumulative distribution function (CDF) was found inadequate because it reduces the number of data points available for accurate curve fitting.To improve this process, the Probit method, already used in the AEP 2920-2016 standard, is introduced as a more effective regression technique for the Gaussian distribution.A comparison is made between results from different regressions, focusing on discrepancies in the tails of the curves, where the divergence between models becomes more significant.The article also discusses methods for estimating the statistical dispersion of test results.Specific examples of trials carried out at the INAIL laboratories in Monte Porzio Catone are provided, showing the application of these methods in practice.These experiments were part of a joint research initiative between the University of Perugia and the Department of Technological Innovations and Safety of Plants, Products, and Anthropic Settlements (DIT).By presenting this research, the article seeks to address the practical limitations of standardized tests and suggests alternative methods to improve accuracy and reliability of machine guard impact resistance evaluations.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-94-3281-3_esrel-sra-e2025-p3440-cd
Primary Topic
Military Defense Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Probability for Impact Resistance of Safety Guards

Luca Landi, Luca Burattini, Carlo Ratti, Lorenzo Landi et al.
Military Defense Systems Analysis
article

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Probability for Impact Resistance of Safety Guards

Luca Landi, Luca Burattini, Carlo Ratti, Lorenzo Landi, Ernesto Del Prete, Fabio Pera
article en

Abstract

The article examines the testing method described in Annex B of the ISO 14120 standard for assessing the impact resistance of machine guards.The typical testing practice involves firing a single shot from a ballistic cannon at the guard, with sensors measuring the projectile's velocity before and after impact.However, meeting the guidelines for this test presents challenges, including the difficulty of identifying and hitting the "weakest point" of the guard and ensuring the projectile strikes the surface in a perpendicular manner.The key findings, derived from a five-year collaboration between two research institutions, focus on analyzing uncertainties inherent in these standardized testing methods.Two statistical distributions, Logistic and Gaussian, are employed to process the data.The traditional approach of creating a histogram before calculating the cumulative distribution function (CDF) was found inadequate because it reduces the number of data points available for accurate curve fitting.To improve this process, the Probit method, already used in the AEP 2920-2016 standard, is introduced as a more effective regression technique for the Gaussian distribution.A comparison is made between results from different regressions, focusing on discrepancies in the tails of the curves, where the divergence between models becomes more significant.The article also discusses methods for estimating the statistical dispersion of test results.Specific examples of trials carried out at the INAIL laboratories in Monte Porzio Catone are provided, showing the application of these methods in practice.These experiments were part of a joint research initiative between the University of Perugia and the Department of Technological Innovations and Safety of Plants, Products, and Anthropic Settlements (DIT).By presenting this research, the article seeks to address the practical limitations of standardized tests and suggests alternative methods to improve accuracy and reliability of machine guard impact resistance evaluations.

Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Military Defense Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Probability for Impact Resistance of Safety Guards — Luca Landi, Luca Burattini, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS