Safety Argumentation for ML-Enabled Perception Systems for Autonomous Trains State of the Discussion and Perspectives

Railway is constantly gaining importance as a sustainable mode of transportation.Highly automated train operation is a means to increase the utilization of existing networks.Technical solutions for driverless operation (Grade of Automation GoA3 and higher) typically rely on Machine Learning (ML) components to evaluate sensor data and establish situational awareness.Due to the inherent complexity and black-box nature of ML components, traditional approaches for safety argumentation are not directly applicable to ML-enabled perception systems.In our paper we present the state of the discussion on this subject and sketch-out potential approaches for technical solutions and the associated safety argumentation.First we discuss safety goals and objectives of perception systems for autonomous trains.We then highlight problem areas that prevent the use of traditional methods for arguing the safety of ML components and propose possible technical solutions and methods at ML component level and at the level of ML-enabled systems as a whole, taking into account the status of work in ongoing major funded projects.Finally we discuss strategies for safety argumentation and the role of safety argumentation as a driver for development decisions.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-94-3281-3_esrel-sra-e2025-p2933-cd
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety Argumentation for ML-Enabled Perception Systems for Autonomous Trains State of the Discussion and Perspectives

Carsten Thomas, Mirko Conrad
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Safety Argumentation for ML-Enabled Perception Systems for Autonomous Trains State of the Discussion and Perspectives

Carsten Thomas, Mirko Conrad
article en

Abstract

Railway is constantly gaining importance as a sustainable mode of transportation.Highly automated train operation is a means to increase the utilization of existing networks.Technical solutions for driverless operation (Grade of Automation GoA3 and higher) typically rely on Machine Learning (ML) components to evaluate sensor data and establish situational awareness.Due to the inherent complexity and black-box nature of ML components, traditional approaches for safety argumentation are not directly applicable to ML-enabled perception systems.In our paper we present the state of the discussion on this subject and sketch-out potential approaches for technical solutions and the associated safety argumentation.First we discuss safety goals and objectives of perception systems for autonomous trains.We then highlight problem areas that prevent the use of traditional methods for arguing the safety of ML components and propose possible technical solutions and methods at ML component level and at the level of ML-enabled systems as a whole, taking into account the status of work in ongoing major funded projects.Finally we discuss strategies for safety argumentation and the role of safety argumentation as a driver for development decisions.

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safety Argumentation for ML-Enabled Perception Systems for Autonomous Trains State of the Discussion and Perspectives — Carsten Thomas, Mirko Conrad · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS