Investigating the "Blues" of Safety Professionals

The aim of this article is twofold.First, it introduces a phenomenon of discontent among safety professionals, termed the "blues," expressed through several recent critical publications about their profession.Although different in tone and geographical origin, these publications share similar analyses about the profession's dysfunctions.The main criticisms focus on excessive bureaucratisation, simplistic approaches to safety, disconnection from field reality, and lack of professional recognition.The authors of these books particularly denounce the excessive time spent on reports and indicators at the expense of more concrete prevention actions.Second, the article outlines a research project to understand better the representativeness of this "blues" and its implications for the profession, particularly by exploring links with the quest for meaningful work and mechanisms of dissonance between professional ideals and field reality.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-94-3281-3_esrel-sra-e2025-p1403-cd
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the "Blues" of Safety Professionals

Jean‐Christophe Le Coze, Justin Larouzée, Didier Delaitre, Aurélien Portelli et al.
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Investigating the "Blues" of Safety Professionals

Jean‐Christophe Le Coze, Justin Larouzée, Didier Delaitre, Aurélien Portelli, Éric Rigaud
article en

Abstract

The aim of this article is twofold.First, it introduces a phenomenon of discontent among safety professionals, termed the "blues," expressed through several recent critical publications about their profession.Although different in tone and geographical origin, these publications share similar analyses about the profession's dysfunctions.The main criticisms focus on excessive bureaucratisation, simplistic approaches to safety, disconnection from field reality, and lack of professional recognition.The authors of these books particularly denounce the excessive time spent on reports and indicators at the expense of more concrete prevention actions.Second, the article outlines a research project to understand better the representativeness of this "blues" and its implications for the profession, particularly by exploring links with the quest for meaningful work and mechanisms of dissonance between professional ideals and field reality.

Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.