Digital Age: Navigating Legal Landscape vis-à-vis Addressing Deepfakes and Manipulated Media

Deepfake technology presents a complex intersection with legal challenges, touching on issues ranging from privacy and intellectual property to national security and defamation. Initially, these technologies emerged as a form of entertainment, allowing users to swap faces in videos for humorous or creative purposes. However, the darker side of deepfakes soon became apparent as malicious actors began exploiting the technology for nefarious purposes. Existing privacy laws are ill-equipped to handle the nuances of deepfake creation and distribution, necessitating a re-evaluation of legal frameworks. Content creators may find their work repurposed in ways that were previously unimaginable, prompting legal battles to establish the limits of artistic and intellectual ownership in the age of deepfakes. Legal systems must adapt to distinguish between malicious intent and unintentional misinformation, balancing the protection of reputation with the right to freedom of expression.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Development Economics and Management Research Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53422/jdms/2025.122603
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Age: Navigating Legal Landscape vis-à-vis Addressing Deepfakes and Manipulated Media

Kushala Simha
Journal of Development Economics and Management Research Studies
Law in Society and Culture
article

Digital Age: Navigating Legal Landscape vis-à-vis Addressing Deepfakes and Manipulated Media

Kushala Simha
article en

Abstract

Deepfake technology presents a complex intersection with legal challenges, touching on issues ranging from privacy and intellectual property to national security and defamation. Initially, these technologies emerged as a form of entertainment, allowing users to swap faces in videos for humorous or creative purposes. However, the darker side of deepfakes soon became apparent as malicious actors began exploiting the technology for nefarious purposes. Existing privacy laws are ill-equipped to handle the nuances of deepfake creation and distribution, necessitating a re-evaluation of legal frameworks. Content creators may find their work repurposed in ways that were previously unimaginable, prompting legal battles to establish the limits of artistic and intellectual ownership in the age of deepfakes. Legal systems must adapt to distinguish between malicious intent and unintentional misinformation, balancing the protection of reputation with the right to freedom of expression.

Journal of Development Economics and Management Research StudiesVol. 01(13)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.