Metrics-Driven Evaluation and Optimization of Honeypots: Toward Standardized Measures of Deception Effectiveness

Honeypots are widely used to study adversary behavior and support enterprise detection, yet their evaluation is fragmented and often qualitative. This paper proposes a unified, metrics-driven framework assessing honeypots across five dimensions—interaction, data quality, resource use, stealth, and fingerprinting resistance—using hard (observable) and soft (context-dependent) indicators. A normalization and weighting pipeline yields composite scores, while methods combining attack automation, anomaly detection, and ATT&CK enrichment enable reproducible comparisons. Case studies span IT, IoT/OT, and ICS/PLC. Benchmarking guidelines and modern datasets are recommended. An integration roadmap positions honeypot telemetry in SIEM–SOAR–CTI with LLM support and ethical guardrails. Standardized metrics and reproducible methods make honeypot studies comparable, operationally useful and fit for continuous improvement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.22.12.2025.12.19
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metrics-Driven Evaluation and Optimization of Honeypots: Toward Standardized Measures of Deception Effectiveness

Eszter Kail, Ernő Rigó, Anna Bánáti, Zoltán Aradi et al.
1 citations
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica
Information and Cyber Security
3.25
article

Metrics-Driven Evaluation and Optimization of Honeypots: Toward Standardized Measures of Deception Effectiveness

Eszter Kail, Ernő Rigó, Anna Bánáti, Zoltán Aradi, Sándor Bottyán
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Honeypots are widely used to study adversary behavior and support enterprise detection, yet their evaluation is fragmented and often qualitative. This paper proposes a unified, metrics-driven framework assessing honeypots across five dimensions—interaction, data quality, resource use, stealth, and fingerprinting resistance—using hard (observable) and soft (context-dependent) indicators. A normalization and weighting pipeline yields composite scores, while methods combining attack automation, anomaly detection, and ATT&CK enrichment enable reproducible comparisons. Case studies span IT, IoT/OT, and ICS/PLC. Benchmarking guidelines and modern datasets are recommended. An integration roadmap positions honeypot telemetry in SIEM–SOAR–CTI with LLM support and ethical guardrails. Standardized metrics and reproducible methods make honeypot studies comparable, operationally useful and fit for continuous improvement.

Acta Polytechnica HungaricaVol. 22(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Information and Cyber Security
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.