How do soil hydro-physical properties vary among land uses and soil depth in Parakou, Northern Benin?

This study investigates the effect of land use on soil hydro-physical properties under four soil depths. Five land uses including Bare soils, Grassland, Agricultural land, Natural Forest and Teck plantation were considered to assess their effects on soil hydro-physical properties including hydraulic conductivity, water stock, bulk density, field capacity, capillary retention capacity, saturated water retention capacity, gravimetric water content, total porosity, and capillary porosity. Twelve soil samples were collected 24 h after infiltration test at four different depths (5, 15, 30, and 50 cm) of vertical soil profile from each land use site. Strong correlation occurred between total porosity, field capacity, capillary retention capacity, saturated water retention capacity, and capillary porosity. However, the bulk density was negatively correlated with the other abovementioned soil properties. The soil hydro-physical properties, especially the hydraulic conductivity, was significantly affected by the land uses. The total porosity showed opposite trend with bulk density that followed the order Teak plantation > Agricultural land > Grassland > Bare soil > Natural Forest. The field capacity, capillary water retention capacity, and saturated water retention capacity were lower in Bare soils, and higher in Teck plantation. The water stock was higher in Grassland and lower in Bare soil, then was positively correlated with soil hydraulic conductivity, which showed highest value in Agricultural land. This study shows that Bare soils performed less well in terms of water retention and hydraulic conductivity, highlighting the need to maintain adequate vegetation cover (grasses and trees) to preserve soil health and soil hydrological functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Soil Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2025-0023
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do soil hydro-physical properties vary among land uses and soil depth in Parakou, Northern Benin?

Pierre Gbènoukpo Tovihoudji, P. B. Irénikatché Akponikpè, Sissou Zakari, M. Gloriose B. Allakonon et al.
Canadian Journal of Soil Science
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

How do soil hydro-physical properties vary among land uses and soil depth in Parakou, Northern Benin?

Pierre Gbènoukpo Tovihoudji, P. B. Irénikatché Akponikpè, Sissou Zakari, M. Gloriose B. Allakonon, Sékaro Amamath Boukari, Imorou Fousseni Ouorou Barrè
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of land use on soil hydro-physical properties under four soil depths. Five land uses including Bare soils, Grassland, Agricultural land, Natural Forest and Teck plantation were considered to assess their effects on soil hydro-physical properties including hydraulic conductivity, water stock, bulk density, field capacity, capillary retention capacity, saturated water retention capacity, gravimetric water content, total porosity, and capillary porosity. Twelve soil samples were collected 24 h after infiltration test at four different depths (5, 15, 30, and 50 cm) of vertical soil profile from each land use site. Strong correlation occurred between total porosity, field capacity, capillary retention capacity, saturated water retention capacity, and capillary porosity. However, the bulk density was negatively correlated with the other abovementioned soil properties. The soil hydro-physical properties, especially the hydraulic conductivity, was significantly affected by the land uses. The total porosity showed opposite trend with bulk density that followed the order Teak plantation > Agricultural land > Grassland > Bare soil > Natural Forest. The field capacity, capillary water retention capacity, and saturated water retention capacity were lower in Bare soils, and higher in Teck plantation. The water stock was higher in Grassland and lower in Bare soil, then was positively correlated with soil hydraulic conductivity, which showed highest value in Agricultural land. This study shows that Bare soils performed less well in terms of water retention and hydraulic conductivity, highlighting the need to maintain adequate vegetation cover (grasses and trees) to preserve soil health and soil hydrological functions.

Canadian Journal of Soil ScienceVol. 105
Department of Science,Technology and Innovation (ZA), State Key Laboratory of Hydrology Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.