Soru Edatlarının Delalet Mertebeleri ve Metinlerin Tefsirindeki Konumu

Interrogative have various meanings, both literal and figurative. Each one has different degrees depending on the frequency of use in the field of meaning. An interrogative is not limited to the meaning that first comes to mind; on the contrary, context and implications can givin it with many times more than its original meaning. When istifham expressions in the Arabic language are examined, it is understood that each interrogative preposition has its original and connotative meanings and that there are common points and differences between them. It is observed that even in the uses of Interrogative that deviate from their literal meaning, they do not completely break away from their original meaning, the Interrogative does not completely strip itself of its own meaning in its connotative meaning and is equipped with another meaning; it is largely the context and connotation that carry it to its figurative meaning. Since the context is sibak and the implicatures surrounding these two play a fundamental role in determining the metaphorical meaning of interrogative particles, all of these should be taken into consideration in the interpretation of the text. In this context, the research aims to answer the following questions: What is the effect of the context, sibak and implicatures in attributing a metaphorical meaning to the interrogative particles without completely excluding the literal meaning? Where does the mistake lie in the interpretations that neglect the context and sibak or that are content with only the figurative meaning of the particle and ignore its literal meaning? What is the position of the context and sibak and the reference to the literal meaning of the particle in the principles of textual interpretation? In the principles of text interpretation, in the light of the possibility of bringing together common words or truth and metaphor, what is the relationship between truth and metaphor with the reference to the original meaning of the question? Although it has been obtained by examining the meanings of question particles in a very deep way in old and modern works, this study tries to reach brand new findings by subjecting it to both qualitative and analytical methods from a new perspective. So the method of this study is as follows: these two methods show the meaning aspects of truth and metaphor in the interpretation of texts and the levels of signification of question particles in their interpretations of texts.