Tropical forest carbon offsets deliver partial gains amid persistent over-crediting

REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation Plus) projects generate carbon credits to offset emissions, but recent studies have questioned their effectiveness. We evaluated 52 voluntary REDD+ projects across 12 tropical countries using synthetic control methods. Only a minority of project units showed statistically significant reductions in deforestation, and just 19% met their reported emissions targets. Nonetheless, many underperforming projects still delivered partial climate benefits, with an estimated 13.2% of tradable credits supported by counterfactual analysis. Effectiveness varied by region, with stronger performance in Brazil and Africa. Although systematic over-crediting remains a concern, our results suggest greater climate benefits than previous assessments. Improving baseline methodologies and strengthening verification frameworks will be essential for enhancing the credibility and impact of forest carbon offsets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adw4094
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tropical forest carbon offsets deliver partial gains amid persistent over-crediting

Wei Tu, Liang Tan, Jonathan M. Chase, Siting Xiong et al.
5 citations
Science
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
article

Tropical forest carbon offsets deliver partial gains amid persistent over-crediting

Wei Tu, Liang Tan, Jonathan M. Chase, Siting Xiong, Shoubin Chen, Chao Yang, Zhaopeng Li, Yuzhi Tang, Kai Guo, Bowen Li, Bo Zhang, Haishan Wu, Zhipeng Chen, Qingquan Li, Zihao Xu, Jindong Tian, Zhijun Wang, Yu Hu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation Plus) projects generate carbon credits to offset emissions, but recent studies have questioned their effectiveness. We evaluated 52 voluntary REDD+ projects across 12 tropical countries using synthetic control methods. Only a minority of project units showed statistically significant reductions in deforestation, and just 19% met their reported emissions targets. Nonetheless, many underperforming projects still delivered partial climate benefits, with an estimated 13.2% of tradable credits supported by counterfactual analysis. Effectiveness varied by region, with stronger performance in Brazil and Africa. Although systematic over-crediting remains a concern, our results suggest greater climate benefits than previous assessments. Improving baseline methodologies and strengthening verification frameworks will be essential for enhancing the credibility and impact of forest carbon offsets.

ScienceVol. 390(6769)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Shenzhen University (CN), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), University of Jazeera (AE), Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN), Nano Carbon (Poland) (PL), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.