TCAD-Based Switching Performance Comparison of 3D Planar and Quasi-Planar Trench 3.3 kV SiC MOSFETs

A detailed numerical study of the dynamic behavior of 3D 3.3 kV SiC MOSFETs constructed with a conventional planar and Quasi-Planar Trench (QPT) design is conducted in this research. The motivation behind this research is to understand the concept and working of QPT, examining its merits and demerits. Static simulations were performed to obtain transfer and output characteristics, threshold voltage, and ON-Resistance (R<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ON</inf>) - offering insights into the conduction behavior of the device. Further, the switching losses are examined and comparisons between the two structures is investigated with the help of advanced 3D TCAD simulations at both ambient and high temperature. Accordingly, the present study focuses on dynamic switching simulations, including Turn-ON, Turn-OFF, and Reverse Recovery conditions. The results of this research indicate that while the trench design can benefit from faster conduction and reduced R<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ON</inf>, its reverse recovery and the tailing current during Turn-OFF significantly increases energy dissipation. The acquired insights throw light on the QPT architecture’s capability to push the limits of high-voltage SiC based power devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isps65707.2025.11189952
Primary Topic
Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TCAD-Based Switching Performance Comparison of 3D Planar and Quasi-Planar Trench 3.3 kV SiC MOSFETs

Luca Maresca, Marina Antoniou, Munaf Rahimo, Alessandro Borghese et al.
Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
article

TCAD-Based Switching Performance Comparison of 3D Planar and Quasi-Planar Trench 3.3 kV SiC MOSFETs

Luca Maresca, Marina Antoniou, Munaf Rahimo, Alessandro Borghese, Giuseppe Capasso, Iulian Nistor, Arne Benjamin Renz, Michele Riccio, Mansha Kansal, Andrea Irace, Kyrylo Melnyk, Neophytos Lophitis, Giovanni Breglio
article en

Abstract

A detailed numerical study of the dynamic behavior of 3D 3.3 kV SiC MOSFETs constructed with a conventional planar and Quasi-Planar Trench (QPT) design is conducted in this research. The motivation behind this research is to understand the concept and working of QPT, examining its merits and demerits. Static simulations were performed to obtain transfer and output characteristics, threshold voltage, and ON-Resistance (R<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ON</inf>) - offering insights into the conduction behavior of the device. Further, the switching losses are examined and comparisons between the two structures is investigated with the help of advanced 3D TCAD simulations at both ambient and high temperature. Accordingly, the present study focuses on dynamic switching simulations, including Turn-ON, Turn-OFF, and Reverse Recovery conditions. The results of this research indicate that while the trench design can benefit from faster conduction and reduced R<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ON</inf>, its reverse recovery and the tailing current during Turn-OFF significantly increases energy dissipation. The acquired insights throw light on the QPT architecture’s capability to push the limits of high-voltage SiC based power devices.

Cyprus University of Technology (CY), University of Warwick (GB), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Data Fusion Research Center (CH), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.