Infectious Epidemic Diseases in National and International Disaster Risk Reduction Strategies: A Comparative Analysis of Türkiye's Disaster Risk Reduction Plan (TARAP) and International Policy Frameworks

Objective: This study aims to evaluate how infectious epidemics are integrated into national and international disaster risk reduction strategies comparatively. It aims to compare Türkiye's Disaster Risk Reduction Plan (TARAP) with similar policy and strategy documents to reveal strengths and areas for development. A comprehensive analysis of the relationship between disaster and health management revealed Türkiye's compliance and differences with international policy frameworks. Method: The study is based on qualitative comparative analysis. The plans were evaluated under four main headings using a thematic coding method: governance and institutional structure, early warning and digital monitoring systems, public awareness and education policies, and financial resources and operational preparedness levels. Results: The comparative analysis revealed that TARAP has similarities and differences with other countries national disaster risk reduction strategies regarding integrating infectious epidemics. In the countries examined, strategic priorities such as increasing health system resilience, strengthening early warning and epidemiological monitoring mechanisms, increasing public awareness, and encouraging intersectoral cooperation are emphasized. Especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, countries have placed epidemics at the center of their disaster policies; they have prioritized digital epidemiological surveillance systems and effective risk communication strategies. TARAP aligns with international trends by classifying epidemics as a type of disaster. However, the lack of detailed planning in implementing post-disaster digital early warning systems and operational resource allocation continues. Conclusions: Integrating infectious diseases into disaster policies requires multi-sectoral, holistic approaches that include strong health systems, effective public health education, and digital infrastructure investments. Although TARAP is a starting point in managing epidemic risks, it must be developed in digital monitoring, financial planning, and stakeholder coordination

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Konuralp Tıp Dergisi
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.1671551
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infectious Epidemic Diseases in National and International Disaster Risk Reduction Strategies: A Comparative Analysis of Türkiye's Disaster Risk Reduction Plan (TARAP) and International Policy Frameworks

Maruf Aras, Çiğdem Tetik Biçer
Konuralp Tıp Dergisi
Disaster Response and Management
article

Infectious Epidemic Diseases in National and International Disaster Risk Reduction Strategies: A Comparative Analysis of Türkiye's Disaster Risk Reduction Plan (TARAP) and International Policy Frameworks

Maruf Aras, Çiğdem Tetik Biçer
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate how infectious epidemics are integrated into national and international disaster risk reduction strategies comparatively. It aims to compare Türkiye's Disaster Risk Reduction Plan (TARAP) with similar policy and strategy documents to reveal strengths and areas for development. A comprehensive analysis of the relationship between disaster and health management revealed Türkiye's compliance and differences with international policy frameworks. Method: The study is based on qualitative comparative analysis. The plans were evaluated under four main headings using a thematic coding method: governance and institutional structure, early warning and digital monitoring systems, public awareness and education policies, and financial resources and operational preparedness levels. Results: The comparative analysis revealed that TARAP has similarities and differences with other countries national disaster risk reduction strategies regarding integrating infectious epidemics. In the countries examined, strategic priorities such as increasing health system resilience, strengthening early warning and epidemiological monitoring mechanisms, increasing public awareness, and encouraging intersectoral cooperation are emphasized. Especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, countries have placed epidemics at the center of their disaster policies; they have prioritized digital epidemiological surveillance systems and effective risk communication strategies. TARAP aligns with international trends by classifying epidemics as a type of disaster. However, the lack of detailed planning in implementing post-disaster digital early warning systems and operational resource allocation continues. Conclusions: Integrating infectious diseases into disaster policies requires multi-sectoral, holistic approaches that include strong health systems, effective public health education, and digital infrastructure investments. Although TARAP is a starting point in managing epidemic risks, it must be developed in digital monitoring, financial planning, and stakeholder coordination

Konuralp Tıp DergisiVol. 17(2)
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.