Osmanlı Mahkemelerinde Elçilik ve Konsolosluk Tercümanlarının Fonksiyonu

The right to use an interpreter in court was adopted as one of the guarantees of procedural law in Islamic and Ottoman law, as it is today, and constituted one of the privileges granted to foreigners in capitulations. However, the weakening of the state and the forced political and economic conditions, and the transformation of the capitulations into a restrictive element of the Ottoman sovereignty, led to the abuse of this right granted to foreigners by trying to use it in a way that exceeded its purpose and scope. The judicial reforms carried out during the Tanzimat Period were put forward by the Ottoman State as a basis for eliminating these excesses. However, foreign state representatives tried to use this right beyond its scope and function by taking advantage of the ambiguity of the expressions in the capitulation texts and through interpretation, in order to protect their own subjects and ensure political interests. This study aims to shed light on the legal nature of the privilege in question, how the function attributed to embassy and consulate translators was evaluated by the parties, and its implementation in the light of capitulation texts and Ottoman and British archive documents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Published
2025-04-02
Primary Topic
Ottoman Empire History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Osmanlı Mahkemelerinde Elçilik ve Konsolosluk Tercümanlarının Fonksiyonu

Müberra Korkmaz
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Ottoman Empire History and Society
article

Osmanlı Mahkemelerinde Elçilik ve Konsolosluk Tercümanlarının Fonksiyonu

Müberra Korkmaz
article en

Abstract

The right to use an interpreter in court was adopted as one of the guarantees of procedural law in Islamic and Ottoman law, as it is today, and constituted one of the privileges granted to foreigners in capitulations. However, the weakening of the state and the forced political and economic conditions, and the transformation of the capitulations into a restrictive element of the Ottoman sovereignty, led to the abuse of this right granted to foreigners by trying to use it in a way that exceeded its purpose and scope. The judicial reforms carried out during the Tanzimat Period were put forward by the Ottoman State as a basis for eliminating these excesses. However, foreign state representatives tried to use this right beyond its scope and function by taking advantage of the ambiguity of the expressions in the capitulation texts and through interpretation, in order to protect their own subjects and ensure political interests. This study aims to shed light on the legal nature of the privilege in question, how the function attributed to embassy and consulate translators was evaluated by the parties, and its implementation in the light of capitulation texts and Ottoman and British archive documents.

DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ottoman Empire History and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Osmanlı Mahkemelerinde Elçilik ve Konsolosluk Tercümanlarının Fonksiyonu — Müberra Korkmaz · DergiPark (Istanbul University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS