Predicting Cycling Performance Before and After Training: Insights From Machine Learning Using Small Samples

Research on optimizing sports performance is challenging due to large individual variability and small sample sizes. Machine learning (ML) is underexplored in predicting performance changes following training interventions. This study aimed to predict 4-km cycling performance before and after a 12-week intervention using ML models, incorporating physiological, training load, and well-being data while identifying key predictors. Twenty-seven recreational cyclists completed baseline tests, including 4-km time-trial, (Formula presented.) O2max, pulmonary (Formula presented.) O2-kinetics, Wingate, squat jump, ultrasound imaging, and anthropometry. They were randomly assigned to one of four training programs. ML models (generalized linear models (glm), random forest (rf), and principal component regression (pcr)) were used to predict performance pre- and post-training, as well as performance changes. Models were evaluated using R2 and mean absolute error (MAE). Cyclists produced 4.1 ± 0.7 W/kg during the time-trial. Change in cycling performance showed substantial individual variability and did not differ between training programs (p >.05). ML models accurately predicted performance pre-training (R2 = 0.875, MAE = 0.260 W/kg) and post-training (R2 = 0.792, MAE = 0.266 W/kg) using glm, but changes in performance were less predictable. Key predictors included power at (Formula presented.) O2max, ventilatory thresholds, body composition, deoxygenation, sleep, and sickness. Findings highlight ML’s potential for predicting endurance performance but indicate difficulty in forecasting individual adaptations to training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2025.2565167
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Cycling Performance Before and After Training: Insights From Machine Learning Using Small Samples

Richie P. Goulding, Jos J. de Koning, Richard T. Jaspers, Guido Weide et al.
1 citations
Applied Artificial Intelligence
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Predicting Cycling Performance Before and After Training: Insights From Machine Learning Using Small Samples

Richie P. Goulding, Jos J. de Koning, Richard T. Jaspers, Guido Weide, Stephan van der Zwaard, Luuk Vos, Renske N. Vergeer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research on optimizing sports performance is challenging due to large individual variability and small sample sizes. Machine learning (ML) is underexplored in predicting performance changes following training interventions. This study aimed to predict 4-km cycling performance before and after a 12-week intervention using ML models, incorporating physiological, training load, and well-being data while identifying key predictors. Twenty-seven recreational cyclists completed baseline tests, including 4-km time-trial, (Formula presented.) O2max, pulmonary (Formula presented.) O2-kinetics, Wingate, squat jump, ultrasound imaging, and anthropometry. They were randomly assigned to one of four training programs. ML models (generalized linear models (glm), random forest (rf), and principal component regression (pcr)) were used to predict performance pre- and post-training, as well as performance changes. Models were evaluated using R2 and mean absolute error (MAE). Cyclists produced 4.1 ± 0.7 W/kg during the time-trial. Change in cycling performance showed substantial individual variability and did not differ between training programs (p >.05). ML models accurately predicted performance pre-training (R2 = 0.875, MAE = 0.260 W/kg) and post-training (R2 = 0.792, MAE = 0.266 W/kg) using glm, but changes in performance were less predictable. Key predictors included power at (Formula presented.) O2max, ventilatory thresholds, body composition, deoxygenation, sleep, and sickness. Findings highlight ML’s potential for predicting endurance performance but indicate difficulty in forecasting individual adaptations to training.

Applied Artificial IntelligenceVol. 39(1)
Laban/Bartenieff Institute of Movement Studies (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.