Security Requirements Engineering: A Review and Analysis

Security is crucial, especially as software systems become increasingly complex. Both practitioners and researchers advocate for the early integration of security requirements (SR) into the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). However, ensuring the validation and assurance of security requirements is still a major challenge in developing secure systems. To investigate this issue, a two-phase study was carried out. First phase: a literature review was conducted on 45 relevant studies related to Security Requirements Engineering (SRE) and Security Requirements Assurance (SRA). Nine SRE techniques were examined across multiple parameters, including major categories, requirements engineering stages, project scale, and the integration of standards involving 17 distinct activities. Second phase: An empirical survey of 58 industry professionals revealed a clear disparity between the understanding of Security Requirements Engineering (SRE) and the implementation of Security Requirements Assurance (SRA). While statistical analyses (ANOVA, regression, correlation, Kruskal–Wallis) confirmed a moderate grasp of SRE practices, SRA remains poorly understood and underapplied. Unlike prior studies focused on isolated models, this research combines practical insights with comparative analysis, highlighting the systemic neglect of SRA in current practices. The findings indicate the need for stronger security assurance in early development phases, offering targeted, data-driven recommendations for bridging this gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14100429
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Security Requirements Engineering: A Review and Analysis

Aliza Sarlan, Aftab Alam Janisar, Abdul Rehman Gilal, Khairul Shafee Kalid et al.
1 citations
Computers
Information and Cyber Security
3.25
article

Security Requirements Engineering: A Review and Analysis

Aliza Sarlan, Aftab Alam Janisar, Abdul Rehman Gilal, Khairul Shafee Kalid, Ayman Meidan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Security is crucial, especially as software systems become increasingly complex. Both practitioners and researchers advocate for the early integration of security requirements (SR) into the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). However, ensuring the validation and assurance of security requirements is still a major challenge in developing secure systems. To investigate this issue, a two-phase study was carried out. First phase: a literature review was conducted on 45 relevant studies related to Security Requirements Engineering (SRE) and Security Requirements Assurance (SRA). Nine SRE techniques were examined across multiple parameters, including major categories, requirements engineering stages, project scale, and the integration of standards involving 17 distinct activities. Second phase: An empirical survey of 58 industry professionals revealed a clear disparity between the understanding of Security Requirements Engineering (SRE) and the implementation of Security Requirements Assurance (SRA). While statistical analyses (ANOVA, regression, correlation, Kruskal–Wallis) confirmed a moderate grasp of SRE practices, SRA remains poorly understood and underapplied. Unlike prior studies focused on isolated models, this research combines practical insights with comparative analysis, highlighting the systemic neglect of SRA in current practices. The findings indicate the need for stronger security assurance in early development phases, offering targeted, data-driven recommendations for bridging this gap.

ComputersVol. 14(10)
Florida International University (US), Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY), Arab Open University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Information and Cyber Security
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.