Participatory mapping of local people's values in restoration landscapes in Western Rwanda

Abstract Introduction Landscape restoration is critical to addressing deforestation, land degradation, and biodiversity loss while promoting human well‐being. However, its success largely depends on local knowledge and values, which are often overlooked, reducing the effectiveness and long‐term sustainability of restoration. Objectives This study used a participatory approach to map landscape values and perceptions of well‐being in Western Rwanda. The goal was to identify priority restoration areas, uncover potential conflicts, and explore the socio‐demographic factors shaping landscape value perceptions within the context of restoration. Methods A Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) survey was used to capture the landscape values and restoration practices' impact on local communities. Our analysis focused on understanding spatial and statistical variations in perceptions. Results In total, 3,047 locations were identified, with regulating values, crop production, and benefits from trees most frequently mapped. Mapped values varied from site to site, reflecting local land use with regulating values, clustered around forests in Rutsiro, whereas in Nyabihu, they were mainly mapped on terraced farmlands. Socio‐demographic factors influenced value perceptions, with landless respondents prioritizing crop production while wealthier landowners emphasized water supply. While restoration was generally viewed as beneficial, concerns were raised about the use of non‐native species in restoration. These species were seen as potential threats, as they could reduce access to key resources, lower crop productivity, and disrupt cultural and traditional uses. Additionally, the same tree species perceived as harmful to livelihoods were also recognized for their negative impacts on biodiversity. Conclusions Overall, the findings underscore the need to balance ecological goals with local socio‐economic realities and demonstrate the value of PPGIS in participatory restoration planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70217
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participatory mapping of local people's values in restoration landscapes in Western Rwanda

Matthias Baumann, Joern Fischer, Venuste Nsengimana, Laura Kmoch et al.
Restoration Ecology
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Participatory mapping of local people's values in restoration landscapes in Western Rwanda

Matthias Baumann, Joern Fischer, Venuste Nsengimana, Laura Kmoch, Gaëlle Ndayizeye, Tobias Plieninger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Landscape restoration is critical to addressing deforestation, land degradation, and biodiversity loss while promoting human well‐being. However, its success largely depends on local knowledge and values, which are often overlooked, reducing the effectiveness and long‐term sustainability of restoration. Objectives This study used a participatory approach to map landscape values and perceptions of well‐being in Western Rwanda. The goal was to identify priority restoration areas, uncover potential conflicts, and explore the socio‐demographic factors shaping landscape value perceptions within the context of restoration. Methods A Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) survey was used to capture the landscape values and restoration practices' impact on local communities. Our analysis focused on understanding spatial and statistical variations in perceptions. Results In total, 3,047 locations were identified, with regulating values, crop production, and benefits from trees most frequently mapped. Mapped values varied from site to site, reflecting local land use with regulating values, clustered around forests in Rutsiro, whereas in Nyabihu, they were mainly mapped on terraced farmlands. Socio‐demographic factors influenced value perceptions, with landless respondents prioritizing crop production while wealthier landowners emphasized water supply. While restoration was generally viewed as beneficial, concerns were raised about the use of non‐native species in restoration. These species were seen as potential threats, as they could reduce access to key resources, lower crop productivity, and disrupt cultural and traditional uses. Additionally, the same tree species perceived as harmful to livelihoods were also recognized for their negative impacts on biodiversity. Conclusions Overall, the findings underscore the need to balance ecological goals with local socio‐economic realities and demonstrate the value of PPGIS in participatory restoration planning.

Restoration EcologyVol. 34(1)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), University of Kigali (RW), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University of Rwanda (RW), University of Göttingen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.