THE ACCURACY OF AI-ASSISTED IMAGING DIAGNOSIS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL EVALUATION OF DENTAL PROFESSIONALS

The accurate detection of dental caries is crucial for effective treatment planning and prevention of disease progression.Artif icial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a valuable tool in odonto-periodontal imaging, offering potential improvements in diagnostic accuracy compared to traditional methods employed by dental professionals.This study aimed to compare the accuracy of AI-assisted odontoperiodontal imaging in detecting dental caries with diagnoses established by general dentists, specialists, and senior specialists.Materials and methods: A comparative analytical study was conducted on a sample of 60 dentists categorized into three professional groups-general dentists, specialists, and senior specialists-alongside AI diagnostics using the Planmeca Romexis platform.Results: High-quality panoramic radiographs (OPG) representing various carious lesions were analyzed independently by all participants.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0, employing chi-square and ANOVA tests to assess differences among groups.Senior specialists and AI reported the highest number of detected lesions, with AI demonstrating a lower standard deviation, indicating greater consistency.The ANOVA test confirmed significant differences in caries detection across groups (F=18.849,p<.001), hig hlighting the superior diagnostic performance of AI.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the significant advantages of AI-assisted diagnostic tools in dental-periodontal imaging, particularly in the detection of carious lesions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Medico-Chirurgicala
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22551/msj.2025.01.27
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE ACCURACY OF AI-ASSISTED IMAGING DIAGNOSIS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL EVALUATION OF DENTAL PROFESSIONALS

Oana BUTNARU
Revista Medico-Chirurgicala
Radiology practices and education
article

THE ACCURACY OF AI-ASSISTED IMAGING DIAGNOSIS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL EVALUATION OF DENTAL PROFESSIONALS

Oana BUTNARU
article en

Abstract

The accurate detection of dental caries is crucial for effective treatment planning and prevention of disease progression.Artif icial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a valuable tool in odonto-periodontal imaging, offering potential improvements in diagnostic accuracy compared to traditional methods employed by dental professionals.This study aimed to compare the accuracy of AI-assisted odontoperiodontal imaging in detecting dental caries with diagnoses established by general dentists, specialists, and senior specialists.Materials and methods: A comparative analytical study was conducted on a sample of 60 dentists categorized into three professional groups-general dentists, specialists, and senior specialists-alongside AI diagnostics using the Planmeca Romexis platform.Results: High-quality panoramic radiographs (OPG) representing various carious lesions were analyzed independently by all participants.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0, employing chi-square and ANOVA tests to assess differences among groups.Senior specialists and AI reported the highest number of detected lesions, with AI demonstrating a lower standard deviation, indicating greater consistency.The ANOVA test confirmed significant differences in caries detection across groups (F=18.849,p<.001), hig hlighting the superior diagnostic performance of AI.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the significant advantages of AI-assisted diagnostic tools in dental-periodontal imaging, particularly in the detection of carious lesions.

Revista Medico-ChirurgicalaVol. 129(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.