Guideline-Concordant Provision of Extended Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism After Major Cancer Surgery Differs by Social and Structural Determinants of Health

IntroductionPatients undergoing major cancer surgery face an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Despite guidelines recommending extended pharmacologic prophylaxis for 30 days after surgery, adoption remains low. Differences in adherence to guidelines for extended prophylaxis based on social and structural determinants of health have not been examined, but if present, may contribute to observed disparities in cancer surgery outcomes.MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort study was performed to identify patients undergoing major gastrointestinal, gynecologic, or urologic cancer resections between 2014 and 2021. Extended prophylaxis was assessed via outpatient low molecular weight heparin prescriptions on hospital discharge and analyzed by demographic factors (age, sex, race, poverty status, and insurance), and procedural factors (organ category, surgical approach, and year) using chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression.ResultsOf 5246 patients, 17.1% received extended prophylaxis, varying by specialty. Extended prophylaxis was higher with increasing age, female sex, and Medicare or Medicaid insurance, but lower among below poverty level (14.3% vs 18.1%), Black (14.5% vs 18.2%), and minimally invasive surgery patients (7.9% vs 23.9%). Multivariable regression showed lower odds of receiving extended prophylaxis for below poverty level (adjusted odds ratio 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.88) and Black patients (0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.89).DiscussionOverall utilization of extended prophylaxis is low (17.1%) while differences in use based on income and race suggest potentially modifiable factors related to social and structural determinants of health. A planned randomized trial (NCT6451003) will test patient and provider education interventions and a decision-support tool to improve guideline adherence and potentially address cancer disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251385110
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guideline-Concordant Provision of Extended Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism After Major Cancer Surgery Differs by Social and Structural Determinants of Health

Tom Curran, Alexander Booth, Justin Marsden, Colleen Donahue et al.
The American Surgeon
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Guideline-Concordant Provision of Extended Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism After Major Cancer Surgery Differs by Social and Structural Determinants of Health

Tom Curran, Alexander Booth, Justin Marsden, Colleen Donahue, Jingwen Zhang
article en

Abstract

IntroductionPatients undergoing major cancer surgery face an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Despite guidelines recommending extended pharmacologic prophylaxis for 30 days after surgery, adoption remains low. Differences in adherence to guidelines for extended prophylaxis based on social and structural determinants of health have not been examined, but if present, may contribute to observed disparities in cancer surgery outcomes.MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort study was performed to identify patients undergoing major gastrointestinal, gynecologic, or urologic cancer resections between 2014 and 2021. Extended prophylaxis was assessed via outpatient low molecular weight heparin prescriptions on hospital discharge and analyzed by demographic factors (age, sex, race, poverty status, and insurance), and procedural factors (organ category, surgical approach, and year) using chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression.ResultsOf 5246 patients, 17.1% received extended prophylaxis, varying by specialty. Extended prophylaxis was higher with increasing age, female sex, and Medicare or Medicaid insurance, but lower among below poverty level (14.3% vs 18.1%), Black (14.5% vs 18.2%), and minimally invasive surgery patients (7.9% vs 23.9%). Multivariable regression showed lower odds of receiving extended prophylaxis for below poverty level (adjusted odds ratio 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.88) and Black patients (0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.89).DiscussionOverall utilization of extended prophylaxis is low (17.1%) while differences in use based on income and race suggest potentially modifiable factors related to social and structural determinants of health. A planned randomized trial (NCT6451003) will test patient and provider education interventions and a decision-support tool to improve guideline adherence and potentially address cancer disparities.

The American SurgeonVol. 92(3)
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.