Learning from Literature: A Retraining-Free Framework for LLM Jailbreak Defense via NLP-Based Adversarial Literature Analysis

Recent surge in adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) have made them vulnerable to sophisticated adversarial attacks, manipulative prompts, and encoded malicious inputs. Existing countermeasures often require retraining models, a process that is computationally expensive and impractical for deployment. This paper introduces a novel defense framework that enables LLMs to autonomously detect, filter, and fend off malicious or adversarial inputs without requiring retraining or fine-tuning. The proposed framework consists of two core components: (1) A summarization module that processes and summarizes adversarial research literature to provide the LLM with context-aware defense knowledge and (2) A prompt filtering module that detects, decodes, and classifies harmful inputs through advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, such as zero-shot classification, keyword analysis, and encoded content detection. By combining text extraction, summarization, and malicious prompt analysis, this approach enhances the robustness of LLMs against adversarial misuse. Experimental results demonstrate that this integrated approach successfully identifies encoded prompts, malicious patterns, and manipulative language structures with a success rate of 98.7%. The framework also enables the model to respond appropriately to malicious prompts with a higher percentage of jailbreak resistance and refusal rate, using minimal quantity of adversarial research literature as context. The framework significantly reduces LLM Attack Success Rate (ASR) as a lightweight, efficient alternative to retraining-based time and resource-consuming defenses, while upholding LLM response quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tps-isa67132.2025.00036
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning from Literature: A Retraining-Free Framework for LLM Jailbreak Defense via NLP-Based Adversarial Literature Analysis

Spyridon Mastorakis, Sheikh Samit Muhaimin
Topic Modeling
article

Learning from Literature: A Retraining-Free Framework for LLM Jailbreak Defense via NLP-Based Adversarial Literature Analysis

Spyridon Mastorakis, Sheikh Samit Muhaimin
article en

Abstract

Recent surge in adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) have made them vulnerable to sophisticated adversarial attacks, manipulative prompts, and encoded malicious inputs. Existing countermeasures often require retraining models, a process that is computationally expensive and impractical for deployment. This paper introduces a novel defense framework that enables LLMs to autonomously detect, filter, and fend off malicious or adversarial inputs without requiring retraining or fine-tuning. The proposed framework consists of two core components: (1) A summarization module that processes and summarizes adversarial research literature to provide the LLM with context-aware defense knowledge and (2) A prompt filtering module that detects, decodes, and classifies harmful inputs through advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, such as zero-shot classification, keyword analysis, and encoded content detection. By combining text extraction, summarization, and malicious prompt analysis, this approach enhances the robustness of LLMs against adversarial misuse. Experimental results demonstrate that this integrated approach successfully identifies encoded prompts, malicious patterns, and manipulative language structures with a success rate of 98.7%. The framework also enables the model to respond appropriately to malicious prompts with a higher percentage of jailbreak resistance and refusal rate, using minimal quantity of adversarial research literature as context. The framework significantly reduces LLM Attack Success Rate (ASR) as a lightweight, efficient alternative to retraining-based time and resource-consuming defenses, while upholding LLM response quality.

University of Notre Dame (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.