Assessing proxy and AI models performance in waterflooding optimization

Water flooding remains one of the most widely used improved oil recovery (IOR) methods, even after decades of hydrocarbon production and the application of various IOR techniques. However, real reservoir simulations are computationally expensive and time-consuming due to the complexity of reservoir models. To address this, researchers increasingly rely on artificial intelligence and neural network-based proxy models as faster alternatives. While proxy models reduce computational effort, their ability to predict reservoir behavior remains a challenge reliably. This study evaluates the reliability of proxy models in optimization tasks. The Punq-S3 benchmark reservoir model was used to optimize well control parameters and maximize net present value (NPV) through two approaches: one based on proxy models and the other on full-physics reservoir simulation. Four deep learning algorithms (ANN, LSTM, GRU, and EL) were combined with two design of experiment techniques (Taguchi and Latin hypercube sampling) to generate eight proxy models. The particle swarm optimization and Bayesian optimization algorithms were selected to optimize the injection and production strategy for the two approaches. after optimization and comparison of the results, it was observed that despite the constructed proxy models exhibited acceptable predictive performance in terms of statistical metrics (e.g., RMSE, R²), the optimization results they yielded significantly deviated from those based on the full-physics reservoir model. This reveals a critical trade-off between computational efficiency and decision-making reliability. While proxy models offer a cost-effective alternative for rapid predictions, caution is needed when applying them to optimization tasks, where minor prediction errors can lead to substantially different outcomes. This study highlights the importance of evaluating proxy models not only based on accuracy metrics but also on their ability to capture optimization-relevant dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19256-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing proxy and AI models performance in waterflooding optimization

Jalal Fahimpour, Yaser Abdollahfard
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
1.15
article

Assessing proxy and AI models performance in waterflooding optimization

Jalal Fahimpour, Yaser Abdollahfard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Water flooding remains one of the most widely used improved oil recovery (IOR) methods, even after decades of hydrocarbon production and the application of various IOR techniques. However, real reservoir simulations are computationally expensive and time-consuming due to the complexity of reservoir models. To address this, researchers increasingly rely on artificial intelligence and neural network-based proxy models as faster alternatives. While proxy models reduce computational effort, their ability to predict reservoir behavior remains a challenge reliably. This study evaluates the reliability of proxy models in optimization tasks. The Punq-S3 benchmark reservoir model was used to optimize well control parameters and maximize net present value (NPV) through two approaches: one based on proxy models and the other on full-physics reservoir simulation. Four deep learning algorithms (ANN, LSTM, GRU, and EL) were combined with two design of experiment techniques (Taguchi and Latin hypercube sampling) to generate eight proxy models. The particle swarm optimization and Bayesian optimization algorithms were selected to optimize the injection and production strategy for the two approaches. after optimization and comparison of the results, it was observed that despite the constructed proxy models exhibited acceptable predictive performance in terms of statistical metrics (e.g., RMSE, R²), the optimization results they yielded significantly deviated from those based on the full-physics reservoir model. This reveals a critical trade-off between computational efficiency and decision-making reliability. While proxy models offer a cost-effective alternative for rapid predictions, caution is needed when applying them to optimization tasks, where minor prediction errors can lead to substantially different outcomes. This study highlights the importance of evaluating proxy models not only based on accuracy metrics but also on their ability to capture optimization-relevant dynamics.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), Heriot-Watt University (GB), Heriot-Watt University Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.