THE ROLE OF TRADITIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN PEACEBUILDING: LESSONS FROM RWANDA'S GACACA COURTS

This study examined the role of traditional institutions, indigenous governance structures, customary law systems, and community-based conflict resolution mechanisms in fostering sustainable peace. Through a detailed case study of Rwanda's Gacaca courts, which processed over one million genocide cases between 2001 and 2012, this research illuminates both the transformative potential and inherent limitations of traditional mechanisms in post-conflict reconciliation. The study employed a qualitative case study approach, drawing on secondary literature, policy documents, and scholarly analyses to examine how Rwanda adapted pre-colonial community justice practices to address mass atrocities. The study found that traditional institutions have unique strengths: cultural legitimacy from indigenous practices, high accessibility for marginalized groups, a focus on restorative relational repair rather than punishment, and the ability to foster community healing through collective engagement. Gacaca's achievement in delivering justice on an unprecedented scale while fostering grassroots reconciliation demonstrates these advantages. The research exposed limitations; gender exclusion, vulnerability to political manipulation, tensions with international human rights standards, and risks of romanticisation complicate traditional institution engagement in peacebuilding. Gacaca's exclusion of gender-based violence, governmental control over proceedings, and limited procedural protections illustrate these challenges. The study concludes by advocating for sophisticated hybrid approaches that transcend false binaries between local and international, traditional and modern approaches. As the limitations of liberal peacebuilding models become increasingly apparent, understanding how to responsibly engage traditional institutions becomes essential for practitioners, policymakers, and scholars committed to building peace that proves both just and durable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Humanities and Social sciences
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51317/ecjahss.v7i1.636
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE ROLE OF TRADITIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN PEACEBUILDING: LESSONS FROM RWANDA'S GACACA COURTS

Kiptoch William Ndiema
Journal of Humanities and Social sciences
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

THE ROLE OF TRADITIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN PEACEBUILDING: LESSONS FROM RWANDA'S GACACA COURTS

Kiptoch William Ndiema
article en

Abstract

This study examined the role of traditional institutions, indigenous governance structures, customary law systems, and community-based conflict resolution mechanisms in fostering sustainable peace. Through a detailed case study of Rwanda's Gacaca courts, which processed over one million genocide cases between 2001 and 2012, this research illuminates both the transformative potential and inherent limitations of traditional mechanisms in post-conflict reconciliation. The study employed a qualitative case study approach, drawing on secondary literature, policy documents, and scholarly analyses to examine how Rwanda adapted pre-colonial community justice practices to address mass atrocities. The study found that traditional institutions have unique strengths: cultural legitimacy from indigenous practices, high accessibility for marginalized groups, a focus on restorative relational repair rather than punishment, and the ability to foster community healing through collective engagement. Gacaca's achievement in delivering justice on an unprecedented scale while fostering grassroots reconciliation demonstrates these advantages. The research exposed limitations; gender exclusion, vulnerability to political manipulation, tensions with international human rights standards, and risks of romanticisation complicate traditional institution engagement in peacebuilding. Gacaca's exclusion of gender-based violence, governmental control over proceedings, and limited procedural protections illustrate these challenges. The study concludes by advocating for sophisticated hybrid approaches that transcend false binaries between local and international, traditional and modern approaches. As the limitations of liberal peacebuilding models become increasingly apparent, understanding how to responsibly engage traditional institutions becomes essential for practitioners, policymakers, and scholars committed to building peace that proves both just and durable.

Journal of Humanities and Social sciencesVol. 7(1)
Kabarak University (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE ROLE OF TRADITIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN PEACEBUILDING: LESSONS FROM RWANDA'S GACACA COURTS — Kiptoch William Ndiema · Journal of Humanities and Social sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS