Investigating the incidence of false positive outcomes in drug detection assays

Immunoassays are widely utilized in urine drug screens due to their simplicity, ease of automation, and rapid results, making them the standard for clinical and workplace drug testing, as well as in rehabilitation programs and legal systems. However, the potential for cross-reactivity with both structurally related and unrelated compounds increases the risk of false-positive results. This poses significant challenges for healthcare professionals, especially in populations undergoing routine drug testing, such as those in recovery or court-ordered monitoring programs. The ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States, which has resulted in countless deaths from both prescription and illicit opioids, underscores the critical importance of accurate drug detection methods. This review evaluates specialized drug assays, highlighting their effectiveness and limitations. While immunoassays are highly sensitive, they often lack specificity, increasing the risk of false positives, which can affect clinical and legal decisions. This research also details substances prone to causing false positives, aiding clinicians in making informed diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Medica Cracoviensia
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24425/fmc.2024.153287
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the incidence of false positive outcomes in drug detection assays

Konrad Kaleta, Beata Bujak-Giżycka, Kamil Możdżeń, Julia Hypnar et al.
Folia Medica Cracoviensia
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

Investigating the incidence of false positive outcomes in drug detection assays

Konrad Kaleta, Beata Bujak-Giżycka, Kamil Możdżeń, Julia Hypnar, Edward Pędziwiatr, Agnieszka Murawska, Ilie Lastovetskyi, Barbara Lorkowska-Zawicka, Mateusz Kęska
article en

Abstract

Immunoassays are widely utilized in urine drug screens due to their simplicity, ease of automation, and rapid results, making them the standard for clinical and workplace drug testing, as well as in rehabilitation programs and legal systems. However, the potential for cross-reactivity with both structurally related and unrelated compounds increases the risk of false-positive results. This poses significant challenges for healthcare professionals, especially in populations undergoing routine drug testing, such as those in recovery or court-ordered monitoring programs. The ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States, which has resulted in countless deaths from both prescription and illicit opioids, underscores the critical importance of accurate drug detection methods. This review evaluates specialized drug assays, highlighting their effectiveness and limitations. While immunoassays are highly sensitive, they often lack specificity, increasing the risk of false positives, which can affect clinical and legal decisions. This research also details substances prone to causing false positives, aiding clinicians in making informed diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.

Folia Medica CracoviensiaVol. 65(1)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.