Anomalies as New Hedge Fund Factors

Abstract We identify a parsimonious set of factors from a large pool of candidates for explaining hedge fund returns, ranging from equity market, anomaly, and trend-following factors to macroeconomic factors. The resulting 9-factor model, including five anomaly factors, outperforms existing hedge fund models both in sample and out of sample, with a significant reduction in alphas while showing substantial cross sectional performance heterogeneity. Further analysis based on fund holdings confirms the model’s ability to capture returns from arbitrage trading. Overall, the anomaly factors help quantify hedge fund strategies and risk exposures and improve fund performance evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109025101270
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anomalies as New Hedge Fund Factors

Guofu Zhou, Sophia Zhengzi Li, Yong Chen, Yushan Tang
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Anomalies as New Hedge Fund Factors

Guofu Zhou, Sophia Zhengzi Li, Yong Chen, Yushan Tang
article en

Abstract

Abstract We identify a parsimonious set of factors from a large pool of candidates for explaining hedge fund returns, ranging from equity market, anomaly, and trend-following factors to macroeconomic factors. The resulting 9-factor model, including five anomaly factors, outperforms existing hedge fund models both in sample and out of sample, with a significant reduction in alphas while showing substantial cross sectional performance heterogeneity. Further analysis based on fund holdings confirms the model’s ability to capture returns from arbitrage trading. Overall, the anomaly factors help quantify hedge fund strategies and risk exposures and improve fund performance evaluation.

Journal of Financial and Quantitative AnalysisVol. 60(8)
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.