Non-genetic factors determine deep learning identified ECG differences between black and white healthy subjects

Artificial intelligence (AI) models capable of detecting a patient's reported race from medical data raise important concerns around fairness and equity. In this study, we investigated whether machine learning models could identify race-based differences in electrocardiograms (ECGs) from healthy Black and White individuals and explored the origins of these differences. We analyzed approximately 10 million ECG traces from 1.76 million subjects across multiple institutions. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classifier was developed and optimized for various configurations, including network depth, fusion strategy, and input format. The best-performing model, a 1-layer late fusion CNN using median beats as input, achieved an AUC of 86.17 (±0.34). Performance was consistent across sexes (AUC≈86%), and analysis suggested race-related ECG signatures appear after birth. Socioeconomic status influenced model accuracy, and interpretability analyses revealed the QRS complex as a key contributor. These findings highlight the presence of non-genetic, race-associated patterns in ECGs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Cardiovascular Health
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44325-025-00087-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-genetic factors determine deep learning identified ECG differences between black and white healthy subjects

Eric M. Isselbacher, Jagmeet P. Singh, Sandeep Chandra Bollepalli, Antonis A. Armoundas
2 citations
npj Cardiovascular Health
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
2.78
article

Non-genetic factors determine deep learning identified ECG differences between black and white healthy subjects

Eric M. Isselbacher, Jagmeet P. Singh, Sandeep Chandra Bollepalli, Antonis A. Armoundas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) models capable of detecting a patient's reported race from medical data raise important concerns around fairness and equity. In this study, we investigated whether machine learning models could identify race-based differences in electrocardiograms (ECGs) from healthy Black and White individuals and explored the origins of these differences. We analyzed approximately 10 million ECG traces from 1.76 million subjects across multiple institutions. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classifier was developed and optimized for various configurations, including network depth, fusion strategy, and input format. The best-performing model, a 1-layer late fusion CNN using median beats as input, achieved an AUC of 86.17 (±0.34). Performance was consistent across sexes (AUC≈86%), and analysis suggested race-related ECG signatures appear after birth. Socioeconomic status influenced model accuracy, and interpretability analyses revealed the QRS complex as a key contributor. These findings highlight the presence of non-genetic, race-associated patterns in ECGs.

npj Cardiovascular HealthVol. 2(1)
Broad Institute (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
American Heart Association, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non-genetic factors determine deep learning identified ECG differences between black and white healthy subjects — Eric M. Isselbacher, Jagmeet P. Singh, et al. · npj Cardiovascular Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS