Assessing decision-making capacity in clinical practice in Norway: a qualitative exploration of stakeholder perspectives

Assessing DMC involves variations and several challenges across the healthcare system. While the four abilities model served as a primary basis of DMC assessments in specialist care, systematic training, validated tools, and further research seem needed to improve assessment quality and better understand factors influencing assessments. Recognising the complex interplay between legal, health service, and societal factors when implementing health law reforms seems crucial for achieving their objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07161-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing decision-making capacity in clinical practice in Norway: a qualitative exploration of stakeholder perspectives

Jacob Jorem, Jørgen Dahlberg, Rei­dun Før­de, Tonje Lossius Husum et al.
1 citations
BMC Psychiatry
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
2.31
article

Assessing decision-making capacity in clinical practice in Norway: a qualitative exploration of stakeholder perspectives

Jacob Jorem, Jørgen Dahlberg, Rei­dun Før­de, Tonje Lossius Husum, Reidar Pedersen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Assessing DMC involves variations and several challenges across the healthcare system. While the four abilities model served as a primary basis of DMC assessments in specialist care, systematic training, validated tools, and further research seem needed to improve assessment quality and better understand factors influencing assessments. Recognising the complex interplay between legal, health service, and societal factors when implementing health law reforms seems crucial for achieving their objectives.

BMC PsychiatryVol. 25(1)
Harvard University (US), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Department of Health Services (US), Columbia University (US)
Universitetet i Bergen, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing decision-making capacity in clinical practice in Norway: a qualitative exploration of stakeholder perspectives — Jacob Jorem, Jørgen Dahlberg, et al. · BMC Psychiatry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS