Comparative efficacy and safety of 577-nm diode laser versus 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized study

Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory skin disorder with physical and psychosocial impact. Laser therapies offer targeted, non-pharmacologic treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the 577-nm diode laser versus the 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser in treating inflammatory acne vulgaris. In this prospective, split-face randomized trial, 52 patients underwent three sessions of laser treatment at two-week intervals. One side of the face was treated with a 577-nm diode laser and the other with a 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser. Outcomes included inflammatory lesion counts, Acne Severity Index (ASI), patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Both lasers significantly reduced inflammatory lesions (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Excellent ASI response was observed in 26.9% (diode) and 28.8% (Nd: YAG) treated sides. Satisfaction scores were comparable (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.6 ± 0.5; p = 0.59). Adverse events were mild and transient, with no serious complications. The 577-nm diode and 1064-nm Nd: YAG lasers are equally effective and well-tolerated for inflammatory acne, offering safe alternatives to conventional therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lasers in Medical Science
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04654-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy and safety of 577-nm diode laser versus 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized study

Mahmoud A. Rageh, Hazem L. Abdel-Aleem, Essamelden M. Mohamed, Ghadeer M. H. Elazab
2 citations
Lasers in Medical Science
Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
4.01
article

Comparative efficacy and safety of 577-nm diode laser versus 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized study

Mahmoud A. Rageh, Hazem L. Abdel-Aleem, Essamelden M. Mohamed, Ghadeer M. H. Elazab
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory skin disorder with physical and psychosocial impact. Laser therapies offer targeted, non-pharmacologic treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the 577-nm diode laser versus the 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser in treating inflammatory acne vulgaris. In this prospective, split-face randomized trial, 52 patients underwent three sessions of laser treatment at two-week intervals. One side of the face was treated with a 577-nm diode laser and the other with a 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser. Outcomes included inflammatory lesion counts, Acne Severity Index (ASI), patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Both lasers significantly reduced inflammatory lesions (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Excellent ASI response was observed in 26.9% (diode) and 28.8% (Nd: YAG) treated sides. Satisfaction scores were comparable (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.6 ± 0.5; p = 0.59). Adverse events were mild and transient, with no serious complications. The 577-nm diode and 1064-nm Nd: YAG lasers are equally effective and well-tolerated for inflammatory acne, offering safe alternatives to conventional therapies.

Lasers in Medical ScienceVol. 40(1)
Al-Azhar University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.