Development and Validation of Digital Stress Scale for Middle-Aged Adults

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a digital stress scale for middle-aged adults in order to support their adaptation to rapidly changing digital environments. Methods: The research was conducted in three phases. In the first phase, 95 preliminary items were generated through a literature review, in-depth interviews, and open-ended surveys. In the second phase, a pilot survey was conducted with 400 middle-aged adults. Exploratory factor analysis identified 33 items across six factors: digital avoidance, digital adaptation burden, digital information overload, digital security concerns, loss of digital control, and digital relationship problems. The reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s α) for the six factors ranged from .87 to .93. In the third phase, a main survey was administered to another group of 400 participants, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed to verify the six-factor model. Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion validity were also examined. Results: The developed digital stress scale consisted of 33 items with six factors, and demonstrated a valid and reliable factor structure. Conclusion: This study developed and validated the first digital stress scale for the middle-aged adults, offering a theoretical basis for understanding their digital adaptation. The scale reflects key psychological and social traits and can inform tailored education and policy. It also lays the groundwork for future research on generational differences and digital stress across life domains.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Society for Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21197/jcei.16.3.15
Primary Topic
Technostress in Professional Settings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of Digital Stress Scale for Middle-Aged Adults

W. Lee, Sang Hee Lee
The Society for Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention
Technostress in Professional Settings
article

Development and Validation of Digital Stress Scale for Middle-Aged Adults

W. Lee, Sang Hee Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a digital stress scale for middle-aged adults in order to support their adaptation to rapidly changing digital environments. Methods: The research was conducted in three phases. In the first phase, 95 preliminary items were generated through a literature review, in-depth interviews, and open-ended surveys. In the second phase, a pilot survey was conducted with 400 middle-aged adults. Exploratory factor analysis identified 33 items across six factors: digital avoidance, digital adaptation burden, digital information overload, digital security concerns, loss of digital control, and digital relationship problems. The reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s α) for the six factors ranged from .87 to .93. In the third phase, a main survey was administered to another group of 400 participants, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed to verify the six-factor model. Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion validity were also examined. Results: The developed digital stress scale consisted of 33 items with six factors, and demonstrated a valid and reliable factor structure. Conclusion: This study developed and validated the first digital stress scale for the middle-aged adults, offering a theoretical basis for understanding their digital adaptation. The scale reflects key psychological and social traits and can inform tailored education and policy. It also lays the groundwork for future research on generational differences and digital stress across life domains.

The Society for Cognitive Enhancement and InterventionVol. 16(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Technostress in Professional Settings
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.