Developing coral seeding devices and rapid deployment methods to scale up reef restoration

Current coral restoration methods are constrained by several factors, including low survival rates and high costs of coral production and deployment, making it difficult to address ecosystem‐wide coral declines. This study introduces a new two‐part coral seeding concept to efficiently settle, transport, and deploy coral spat. We then tested this concept, with the aims of (1) identifying characteristics of effective, freely deployed (i.e. unattached) seeding devices, (2) describing suitable deployment locations to maximize the success of coral seeding, and (3) comparing surface versus diver‐deployed device performance. During 6 deployments of 6,400 total devices, we assessed the retention (proportion found), displacement, and yield (i.e. proportion of devices found that had live corals) of 5 alumina ceramic coral seeding device designs to describe the benthic topography where the devices were most successful. After 12–14 months, retention of seeding devices ranged from 62 to 89% and yield ranged from 24 to 60% among deployments. While device shape had minimal influence on the outcome of coral seeding, significant differences in retention and yield were observed among deployment plots. For example, retention was negatively correlated with reef rugosity. Importantly, seeding devices released from the surface demonstrated retention and yield comparable to devices deployed by divers, reducing the cost and increasing the scalability of coral seeding. This study highlights the feasibility of expanding the scale of coral restoration (to hectares) using sexual propagation and coral seeding. However, the success of coral seeding will depend on species selection and characteristics of the receiving sites, including the benthic terrain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70206
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing coral seeding devices and rapid deployment methods to scale up reef restoration

Rebecca Forster, Carly J. Randall, David A. Mead, Andrea Severati et al.
6 citations
Restoration Ecology
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
10.30
article

Developing coral seeding devices and rapid deployment methods to scale up reef restoration

Rebecca Forster, Carly J. Randall, David A. Mead, Andrea Severati, Muhammad Azmi Abdul Wahab, Blake D. Ramsby, Sophie N. Ferguson, Pirjo Haikola
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Current coral restoration methods are constrained by several factors, including low survival rates and high costs of coral production and deployment, making it difficult to address ecosystem‐wide coral declines. This study introduces a new two‐part coral seeding concept to efficiently settle, transport, and deploy coral spat. We then tested this concept, with the aims of (1) identifying characteristics of effective, freely deployed (i.e. unattached) seeding devices, (2) describing suitable deployment locations to maximize the success of coral seeding, and (3) comparing surface versus diver‐deployed device performance. During 6 deployments of 6,400 total devices, we assessed the retention (proportion found), displacement, and yield (i.e. proportion of devices found that had live corals) of 5 alumina ceramic coral seeding device designs to describe the benthic topography where the devices were most successful. After 12–14 months, retention of seeding devices ranged from 62 to 89% and yield ranged from 24 to 60% among deployments. While device shape had minimal influence on the outcome of coral seeding, significant differences in retention and yield were observed among deployment plots. For example, retention was negatively correlated with reef rugosity. Importantly, seeding devices released from the surface demonstrated retention and yield comparable to devices deployed by divers, reducing the cost and increasing the scalability of coral seeding. This study highlights the feasibility of expanding the scale of coral restoration (to hectares) using sexual propagation and coral seeding. However, the success of coral seeding will depend on species selection and characteristics of the receiving sites, including the benthic terrain.

Restoration EcologyVol. 34(1)
Australian Institute of Marine Science (AU), RMIT Europe (ES)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
10.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.