Estimating the Effects of Restitution Penalties on Juvenile Recidivism

This study investigates the potential causal relationship between the assignment of financial restitution penalties to juvenile offenders and subsequent recidivism, defined as being sentenced for a new offense within the next two years. Although the use of financial penalties on juveniles is prevalent, there is limited research on its potential link to reoffending. Using a dataset of all juvenile offenders in the state of Pennsylvania from 2015 to 2017 ( n = 15,382), we implement a propensity-score matching model to estimate the effects of restitution assignment on future recidivism and test for endogeneity between the two using a control function model. Controlling for offender demographics, criminal history, and offense type and severity, we estimate that restitution assignment increases recidivism rates by 26-percentage points ( p < 0.001) and do not find statistical evidence of endogeneity. Higher rates of recidivism are found for those assigned restitution across all offense grades, categories, and dispositions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040251384124
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Effects of Restitution Penalties on Juvenile Recidivism

Jennifer L. Smith, Brandon Vick
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Estimating the Effects of Restitution Penalties on Juvenile Recidivism

Jennifer L. Smith, Brandon Vick
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the potential causal relationship between the assignment of financial restitution penalties to juvenile offenders and subsequent recidivism, defined as being sentenced for a new offense within the next two years. Although the use of financial penalties on juveniles is prevalent, there is limited research on its potential link to reoffending. Using a dataset of all juvenile offenders in the state of Pennsylvania from 2015 to 2017 ( n = 15,382), we implement a propensity-score matching model to estimate the effects of restitution assignment on future recidivism and test for endogeneity between the two using a control function model. Controlling for offender demographics, criminal history, and offense type and severity, we estimate that restitution assignment increases recidivism rates by 26-percentage points ( p < 0.001) and do not find statistical evidence of endogeneity. Higher rates of recidivism are found for those assigned restitution across all offense grades, categories, and dispositions.

Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeVol. 24(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Indiana University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.