Park Acreage and Physical Activity Among Adolescents Living in Green Cities: Conceptualizing Urban Park Oases and Centering Equity

Regular participation in physical activity improves health across the life course, and proximal access to parks can facilitate activity among youth. The 10-minute walk guideline demonstrates the health-promoting benefits of accessible parks. Yet, the contributions of other park attributes to young people’s activity levels are underexplored. In this study, we conceptualize how a public health threshold for park acreage could complement the currently available 10-minute walk standard for park access. We examined cross-sectional associations between park acreage and physical activity among a sample of adolescents living in two U.S.-based “green cities” with highly accessible park systems. Data were drawn from the Project EAT (Eating and Activity over Time; 2010 cohort) study. Adolescents ( n = 2271) lived in Minneapolis or St. Paul (Minnesota) and were diverse in race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES). To isolate the potential contributions of park acreage, we restricted the sample to adolescents with adequate park access per the 10-minute walk guideline. Next, we used established land-use data to assign participants to groups that differed by neighborhood-level park acreage composition. After testing various land-use cut-points within a specified network buffer, we conceptualized “Urban Park Oases” as areas in which adolescents had at least 10% park acreage within a 10-minute ride/drive of their homes. Adjusting for socioeconomic, environmental, and structural privilege factors, adolescents living in neighborhoods with less than 10% park acreage land-use reported significantly fewer weekly hours of moderate-vigorous physical activity (β [95% confidence interval]: −0.25 [−0.49, −0.01]) compared with peers living in acreage-rich neighborhoods. Parkland was inequitably distributed, such that racially/ethnically minoritized and low-SES adolescents were less likely to live in Urban Park Oases. Park acreage may support adolescents’ physical activity. However, public health initiatives and land-use policies should prioritize more equitable allocation of parkland, including in cities known for accessible park systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Justice
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19394071251383709
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Park Acreage and Physical Activity Among Adolescents Living in Green Cities: Conceptualizing Urban Park Oases and Centering Equity

Junia N. de Brito, Sarah M. Kaja, Daheia J. Barr‐Anderson, Eydie N. Kramer-Kostecka et al.
Environmental Justice
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Park Acreage and Physical Activity Among Adolescents Living in Green Cities: Conceptualizing Urban Park Oases and Centering Equity

Junia N. de Brito, Sarah M. Kaja, Daheia J. Barr‐Anderson, Eydie N. Kramer-Kostecka, Dianne Neumark‐Sztainer, Jaime Slaughter‐Acey
article en

Abstract

Regular participation in physical activity improves health across the life course, and proximal access to parks can facilitate activity among youth. The 10-minute walk guideline demonstrates the health-promoting benefits of accessible parks. Yet, the contributions of other park attributes to young people’s activity levels are underexplored. In this study, we conceptualize how a public health threshold for park acreage could complement the currently available 10-minute walk standard for park access. We examined cross-sectional associations between park acreage and physical activity among a sample of adolescents living in two U.S.-based “green cities” with highly accessible park systems. Data were drawn from the Project EAT (Eating and Activity over Time; 2010 cohort) study. Adolescents ( n = 2271) lived in Minneapolis or St. Paul (Minnesota) and were diverse in race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES). To isolate the potential contributions of park acreage, we restricted the sample to adolescents with adequate park access per the 10-minute walk guideline. Next, we used established land-use data to assign participants to groups that differed by neighborhood-level park acreage composition. After testing various land-use cut-points within a specified network buffer, we conceptualized “Urban Park Oases” as areas in which adolescents had at least 10% park acreage within a 10-minute ride/drive of their homes. Adjusting for socioeconomic, environmental, and structural privilege factors, adolescents living in neighborhoods with less than 10% park acreage land-use reported significantly fewer weekly hours of moderate-vigorous physical activity (β [95% confidence interval]: −0.25 [−0.49, −0.01]) compared with peers living in acreage-rich neighborhoods. Parkland was inequitably distributed, such that racially/ethnically minoritized and low-SES adolescents were less likely to live in Urban Park Oases. Park acreage may support adolescents’ physical activity. However, public health initiatives and land-use policies should prioritize more equitable allocation of parkland, including in cities known for accessible park systems.

Environmental Justice
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Minnesota (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.