Uplift, erosion, and advection within the orogenic wedge of the Northern Apennines (Italy)

• Erosion rates in the Northern Apennines mountains in northern Italy reflect the tectonic setting. • Erosion rates are higher on the gentler side of the main drainage divide than on the steeper side. • The erosional flux is a vector with horizontal and vertical components. • Horizontal motion dominates the retrowedge; the prowedge shows more vertical uplift. • Tectonic advection drives drainage reorganization: river capture and drainage divide migration. The Northern Apennines are an active orogenic wedge formed by subduction and rollback of the Adriatic slab over the last 30 Ma, with high rates of horizontal tectonic advection of topography from northeast to southwest. The orogen exhibits topographic asymmetry across the main drainage divide: the retrowedge on the Ligurian (generally southwestern) side is steeper than the prowedge on the Adriatic (generally northeastern) side. In this study, we present new catchment-averaged erosion rates and horizontal velocities from major drainage basins in the northwestern Northern Apennines derived from cosmogenic 10 Be concentrations, supplementing published data, in order to quantify the erosional fluxes from the orogen and compare the pattern of modern erosion rates with the topographic asymmetry. Catchment-averaged erosion rates and horizontal velocities increase from west to east throughout the study area; rates on the steeper Ligurian side of the main drainage divide are lower than those on the gentler Adriatic side. We reconcile these data with a kinematic model of slab rollback, where the erosional flux is described as a vector with horizontal and vertical components. The model predicts that the topography and erosion rates can be sustained by horizontal motion that dominates the Ligurian side, while both horizontal motion and vertical uplift are required on the Adriatic side. Our results provide insights into tectonically driven drainage reorganization, where horizontal shortening and topographic advection lead to river capture and drainage divide migration opposite the direction of the horizontal tectonic advection of topography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Published
2025-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119661
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uplift, erosion, and advection within the orogenic wedge of the Northern Apennines (Italy)

Philip Gautschi, Negar Haghipour, Yanyan Wang, Marcus Christl et al.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Uplift, erosion, and advection within the orogenic wedge of the Northern Apennines (Italy)

Philip Gautschi, Negar Haghipour, Yanyan Wang, Marcus Christl, Gabrielle Vance, Vincenzo Picotti, Romano Clementucci, Erica Erlanger, Sean D. Willett
article en

Abstract

• Erosion rates in the Northern Apennines mountains in northern Italy reflect the tectonic setting. • Erosion rates are higher on the gentler side of the main drainage divide than on the steeper side. • The erosional flux is a vector with horizontal and vertical components. • Horizontal motion dominates the retrowedge; the prowedge shows more vertical uplift. • Tectonic advection drives drainage reorganization: river capture and drainage divide migration. The Northern Apennines are an active orogenic wedge formed by subduction and rollback of the Adriatic slab over the last 30 Ma, with high rates of horizontal tectonic advection of topography from northeast to southwest. The orogen exhibits topographic asymmetry across the main drainage divide: the retrowedge on the Ligurian (generally southwestern) side is steeper than the prowedge on the Adriatic (generally northeastern) side. In this study, we present new catchment-averaged erosion rates and horizontal velocities from major drainage basins in the northwestern Northern Apennines derived from cosmogenic 10 Be concentrations, supplementing published data, in order to quantify the erosional fluxes from the orogen and compare the pattern of modern erosion rates with the topographic asymmetry. Catchment-averaged erosion rates and horizontal velocities increase from west to east throughout the study area; rates on the steeper Ligurian side of the main drainage divide are lower than those on the gentler Adriatic side. We reconcile these data with a kinematic model of slab rollback, where the erosional flux is described as a vector with horizontal and vertical components. The model predicts that the topography and erosion rates can be sustained by horizontal motion that dominates the Ligurian side, while both horizontal motion and vertical uplift are required on the Adriatic side. Our results provide insights into tectonically driven drainage reorganization, where horizontal shortening and topographic advection lead to river capture and drainage divide migration opposite the direction of the horizontal tectonic advection of topography.

Earth and Planetary Science LettersVol. 671
ETH Zurich (CH), Geological Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.